The author previously proposed an extension of differential evolution. The proposed method extends the processes of DE to handle interval numbers as genotype values so that DE can be applied to interval-valued optimization problems. The interval DE can employ either of two interval models, the lower and upper model or the center and width model, for specifying genotype values. Ability of the interval DE in searching for solutions may depend on the model. In this paper, the author compares the two models to investigate which model contributes better for the interval DE to find better solutions. Application of the interval DE is evolutionary training of interval-valued neural networks. A result of preliminary study indicates that the CW model is better than the LU model: the interval DE with the CW model could evolve better neural networks.
 R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution - a simple and efficient
heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, Journal of
Global Optimization, Vol.11, No.4, pp.341-359, 1997.
 T. Bäck, Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution
Strategies, Evolutionary Programming, Genetic Algorithms, Oxford
Univ. Press, 1996.
 H. Okada, Proposal of fuzzy evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy-valued
genotypes, Proc. of Int. Conf. on Instrumentation, Control, Information
Technology and System Integration (SICE Annual Conference) 2012,
 H. Ishibuchi, H. Tanaka and H. Okada, An architecture of neural
networks with interval weights and its application to fuzzy regression
analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.57, No.1, pp.27-39, 1993.
 H. Okada: Interval-valued differential evolution for evolving neural
networks with interval weights and biases, Proc. of the 6th International
Workshop on Computational Intelligence & Applications (IWCIA2013),
 G. Alefeld and J. Herzberger, Introduction to Interval Computation,
Academic Press, 1983.