Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29830


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10001398
Determinants of Never Users of Contraception – Results from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2012-13
Abstract:
Introduction: There are multiple social, individual and cultural factors that influence an individual’s decision to adopt family planning methods especially among non-users in patriarchal societies like Pakistan. Non-users, if targeted efficiently, can contribute significantly to country’s CPR. A research study showed that nonusers if convinced to adopt lactational amenorrhea method can shift to long term methods in future. Research shows that if non users are targeted efficiently a 59% reduction in unintended pregnancies in Saharan Africa and South-Central and South-East Asia is anticipated. Methods: We did secondary data analysis on Pakistan Demographic Heath Survey (2012-13) dataset. Use of contraception (never-use/ever-use) was the outcome variable. At univariate level Chi-square/Fisher Exact test was used to assess relationship of baseline covariates with contraception use. Then variables to be incorporated in the model were checked for multicollinearity, confounding and interaction. Then binary logistic regression (with an urban-rural stratification) was done to find relationship between contraception use and baseline demographic and social variables. Results: The multivariate analyses of the study showed that younger women (≤ 29 years)were more prone to be never users as compared to those who were >30 years and this trend was seen in urban areas (AOR 1.92, CI 1.453-2.536) as well as rural areas (AOR 1.809, CI 1.421-2.303). While looking at regional variation, women from urban Sindh (AOR 1.548, CI 1.142-2.099) and urban Balochistan (AOR 2.403, CI 1.504-3.839) had more never users as compared to other urban regions. Women in the rich wealth quintile were more never users and this was seen both in urban and rural localities (urban (AOR 1.106 CI .753-1.624); rural areas (AOR 1.162, CI .887-1.524)) even though these were not statistically significant. Women idealizing more children (>4) are more never users as compared to those idealizing less children in both urban (AOR 1.854, CI 1.275-2.697) and rural areas (AOR 2.101, CI 1.514-2.916). Women who never lost a pregnancy were more inclined to be nonusers in rural areas (AOR 1.394, CI 1.127-1.723) .Women familiar with only traditional or no method had more never users in rural areas (AOR 1.717, CI 1.127-1.723) but in urban areas it wasn’t significant. Women unaware of Lady Health Worker’s presence in their area were more never users especially in rural areas (AOR 1.276, CI 1.014-1.607). Women who did not visit any care provider were more never users (urban (AOR 11.738, CI 9.112-15.121) rural areas (AOR 7.832, CI 6.243-9.826)). Discussion/Conclusion: This study concluded that government, policy makers and private sector family planning programs should focus on the untapped pool of never users (younger women from underserved provinces, in higher wealth quintiles, who desire more children.). We need to make sure to cover catchment areas where there are less LHWs and less providers as ignorance to modern methods and never been visited by an LHW are important determinants of never use. This all is in sync with previous literate from similar developing countries.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] Kent, M. M. Larson, A. Fertility Size Preferences: Evidence from the World Fertility Surveys. Reports on the World Fertility Survey No. 4.Washington DC: Population Reference Bureau; 1982.
[2] Darroch, J. E. Singh, S. Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, and 2012: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet, 2013; 381 (9879): 1756-1762.
[3] Singh, S. Darroch, J. E. Ashford, L. S. Adding it Up: The Costs and Benefits of Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/AddingItUp2014.pdf.
[4] Kamran, I. Arif, M. S. Vassos, K. Concordance and discordance of couples living in a rural Pakistani village: perspectives on contraception and abortion–a qualitative study. Glob Public Health, 2011; 6 Suppl 1: S38-51.
[5] Sohail, Agha. Aslam, Fareed. Joseph, Keating. Clinical training alone is not sufficient for reducing barriers to IUD provision among private providers in Pakistan, Reproductive Health, 2011, 8: 40.
[6] Pakistan Millennium Development Goals Report 2013, Ministry of Planning, Development and Reform, Retrieved from: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/pakistan/docs/MDGs/MDG2013Repo rt/UNDP-Report13.pdf.
[7] Demographic and Health Survey 2012-13, National Institute of Population Studies, Retrieved from: http://www.nips.org.pk/abstract_files/PDHS%20Final%20Report%20as %20of%20Jan%2022-2014.pdf.
[8] Mohamed, M. Ali. Min, Hae. Park. Thoai, D. Ngo. Levels and determinants of switching following intrauterine device discontinuation in 14 developing countries, Contraception; 90, 2014; 47-53.
[9] Swan, M. Zwi, A. Private practitioners and public health: close the gap or increase the distance. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 1997.
[10] Rajesh, Kumar. Rai. Sayeed, Unisa. Dynamics of contraceptive use in India: Apprehension versus future intention among non-users and traditional method users, Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 4, 2013; 65-72.
[11] Michael, T. Mbizvo. Sharon, J. Phillips. Family planning: Choices and challenges for developing countries, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28, 2014; 931-943.
[12] Wu, J. Meldrum, S. Dozier, A. Stanwood, N. Fiscella, K. Contraceptive nonuse among US women at risk for unplanned pregnancy. Contraception, 2008; 78: 284-289.
[13] Carme, Saurina. Laura, Vall-llosera. Marc, Saez. Factors determining family planning in Catalonia: Sources of inequity, Saurina et al. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2012; 11: 35.
[14] Creanga, A. A. Gillespie, D. Karklins, S. Tsui, A. O. Low use of contraception among poor women in Africa: an equity issue. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2011; 89 (4), 258-266.
[15] Rahman, A. Rahman, M. Siddiqui, M. R. Zaman, J. A. Contraceptive Practice of Married Women: Experience from a Rural Community of Bangladesh, J Medicine, 2014; 15: 9-13.
[16] Kari, L. White. Joseph, E. Potter. Patterns of contraceptive use among Mexican-origin women, Demographic Research, 2013; (28) 41, 1199- 1212.
[17] Michelle, J. Hindin. Laura, J. McGough. Richard, M. Adanu. Misperceptions, misinformation and myths about modern contraceptive use in Ghana, J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care, 2014; 40: 30-35
[18] Shabnam, Khowaja. Nigar, Jabeen. Najma, B. Shaikh. Awareness and prevalence of utilizing family planning services among women attending at Aga Khan Maternal & Child Care Center Hyderabad (AKMCCC), MC, 2012; (18) 4, 44-48.
[19] Pakistan Integrated Household Survey: Round 4. Retrieved from: http://www.statpak.gov.pk/depts/fbs/statistics/pihs2000-2001/pihs2001- 02_3.pdf 2001–2002, p. 77.
Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007