Inquiry on the Improvement Teaching Quality in the Classroom with Meta-Teaching Skills
When teachers reflect and evaluate whether their teaching methods actually have an impact on students’ learning, they will adjust their practices accordingly. This inevitably improves their students’ learning and performance. The approach in meta-teaching can invigorate and create a passion for teaching. It thus helps to increase the commitment and love for the teaching profession. This study was conducted to determine the level of metacognitive thinking of teachers in the process of teaching and learning in the classroom. Metacognitive thinking teachers include the use of metacognitive knowledge which consists of different types of knowledge: declarative, procedural and conditional. The ability of the teachers to plan, monitor and evaluate the teaching process can also be determined. This study was conducted on 377 graduate teachers in Klang Valley, Malaysia. The stratified sampling method was selected for the purpose of this study. The metacognitive teaching inventory consisting of 24 items is called InKePMG (Teacher Indicators of Effectiveness Meta-Teaching). The results showed the level of mean is high for two components of metacognitive knowledge; declarative knowledge (mean = 4.16) and conditional (mean = 4.11) whereas, the mean of procedural knowledge is 4.00 (moderately high). Similarly, the level of knowledge in monitoring (mean = 4.11), evaluating (mean = 4.00) which indicate high score and planning (mean = 4.00) are moderately high score among teachers. In conclusion, this study shows that the planning and procedural knowledge is an important element in improving the quality of teachers teaching in the classroom. Thus, the researcher recommended that further studies should focus on training programs for teachers on metacognitive skills and also on developing creative thinking among teachers.
 Westmoreland, D. (2014). Science and social controversy – A classroom exercise in metacognition. Retrieved from http://www.improvewithmetacognition.com/science-and-social-controversy-a-classroom-exercise-in-metacognition/ (retrieved 10 May 2016).
 Nuhfer, E. (2104). Metacognition for guiding students to awareness of higher-level thinking (part2). Retrieved from http://www.improvewithmetacognition.com/metacognition-for-guiding students-to-awareness-of-higher-level-thinking-part-2/ (retrieved 25 April 2016).
 Was, C. (2014). Are current metacognition measures missing the target? Retrieved fromhttp://www.improvewithmetacognition.com/are-current-metacognition-measures-missing-the-target/ (retrieved 15 March 2016).
 Richmond, S. (2014, August 28th). Meta-teaching: Improve your teaching while improving your student’s metacognition. Retrieved from http://www.improvewithmetacognition.com/meta-teaching-improve-your-teaching-while-improving-students-metacognition/ (1/08/2016).
 Leat D, Higgins S (2002) The role of powerful pedagogical strategies in curriculum development. The Curriculum Journal 13: 71–85.
 Leat D, Lin M (2003) Developing a pedagogy of metacognition and transfer: some signposts for the generation and use of knowledge and the creation of research partnerships. British Education Research Journal 29: 383–415.
 Chen, X. (2013). Meta-teaching: Meaning and Strategy. Africa Education Review, 10(1), S63-S74. doi:10.1080/18146627.2013.855431
 Nietfeld, J., & Schraw, G. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 131–142.
 Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66 – 73.
 Scanlon, D. 2014. The Teaching Excellence in Adult Literacy (TEAL) Centre is a project of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE), designed to improve the quality of teaching in adult education in the content areas. Boston College.
 North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (2003). enGauge 21st Century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Naperville, IL: Author. Retrieved online May 8, 2016, from www.ncrel.org/engauge/skills/engauge21st.pdf
 Favell, J. H. 1976. Metacognitive Aspect of Problem Solving. In L.B. Resnick (edt.). The Nature of Intelligence, 231-235. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y. and Wixson, K. K. (1983) Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
 Miechenbaum, D., &, Biemiller, A. 1998. Nurturing Independent Learners: Helping Students Take Charge of Their Learning. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
 Fogarty, R. 1994. How to Teach for Metacognitive Reflection. Glenview, Illinois: Pearson SkyLight.
 Anderson, J. R. 1985. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. Ed.ke-2. New York: Freeman.
 Reber, A., & Reber, E. 2001. The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology. Ed.ke-3. London: Penguin Group.
 Woolfolk, A. 2008. Educational Psychology. 9 Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
 Shahlan. (2012) Keberkesanan strategi 4-META dalam penulisan karangan Bahasa Melayu Pelajar Tingkatan 4. Tesis Dr.Fal. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.