Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29830


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
13960
Investigating the Individual Difference Antecedents of Perceived Enjoyment in the Acceptance of Blogging
Abstract:
With the proliferation of Weblogs (blogs) use in educational contexts, gaining a better understanding of why students are willing to utilize blog systems has become an important topic for practitioners and academics. While perceived enjoyment has been found to have a significant influence on behavioral intentions to use blogs or hedonic systems, few studies have investigated the antecedents of perceived enjoyment in the acceptance of blogging. The main purpose of the present study is to explore the individual difference antecedents of perceived enjoyment and examine how they influence behavioral intention to blog through the mediation of perceived enjoyment. Based on the previous literature, the Big Five personality traits (i.e., extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience), as well as computer self-efficacy and personal innovation in information technology (PIIT), are hypothesized as potential antecedents of perceived enjoyment in the acceptance of blogging. Data collected from 358 respondents in Taiwan are tested against the research model using the structural equation modeling approach. The results indicate that extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and PIIT have a significant influence on perceived enjoyment, which in turn significantly influences the behavioral intention to blog. These findings lead to several important implications for future research.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E., 2000. Time flies when you-re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
[2] Agarwal, R., Prasad, J., 1998. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.
[3] Agarwal, R., Prasad, J., 1999. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
[4] Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., Stair, R.M., 2000. Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy -- an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430.
[5] Aguilar, M.L., Kaiser, R.T., Murray, C.B., Ozer, D.J., 1998. Validation of an adjective Q-sort as a measure of the Big Five personality structure. Journal of Black Psychology, 24(2), 145-163.
[6] Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior, in: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognitive to Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 11-39.
[7] Ajzen, I., 1988. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Chicago, Illinois: The Dorsey Press.
[8] Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[9] Alavi, M., Joachimsthaler, E.A., 1992. Revisiting DSS implementation research: a meta-analysis of the literature and suggests for researchers. MIS Quarterly, 16(1), 95-116.
[10] Amichai-Hamburger, Y., 2002. Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 1-10.
[11] Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Ben-Artzi, E., 2003. Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 71-80.
[12] Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., 1991. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
[13] Benbasat, I., Barki, H., 2007. Quo Vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211-218.
[14] Benet-Martinez, V., John, O.P., 1998. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
[15] Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[16] Chau, P.Y.K., 2001. Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26-33.
[17] Chung, J., Tan, F.B., 2004. Antecedents of perceived playfulness: an exploratory study on user acceptance of general information-searching websites. Information & Management, 41(7), 869-881.
[18] Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., 1995. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
[19] Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R., 1992. NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
[20] Cyr, D., Head, M., Ivanov, A., 2006. Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information & Management, 43(8), 950-963.
[21] Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R., 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
[22] Deci, E.L., 1975. Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.
[23] Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
[24] Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 1987. Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 754-765.
[25] Dickinger, A., Arami, M., Meyer, D., 2006. Reconsidering the adoption process: enjoyment and social norms - antecedents of hedonic mobile technology use. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[26] Du, H.S., Wagner, C., 2006. Weblog success: exploring the role of technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 64(9), 789-798.
[27] Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[28] Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
[29] Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., 1997. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.
[30] Ghani, J., Supnick, R., Rooney, P., 1991. The experience of flow in computer-mediated and in face-to-face groups, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems, 229-237.
[31] Griffin, R.W., 1999. Management. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
[32] Guadagno, R.E., Okdie, B.M., Eno, C.A., 2008. Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1993-2004.
[33] Hair, J.T., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 1992. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, third ed. New York: Macmillan.
[34] Hamburger, Y.A., Ben-Artzi, E., 2000. The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 441-449.
[35] Harrison, A.W., Rainer, R.K., Jr., 1992. The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 93-111.
[36] Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., 1996. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environment: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68.
[37] Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W.-M., Tam, K.Y., 2002. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124.
[38] Hsu, C. L. and Lin, J. C., 2008. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation, Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.
[39] Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P., 2007. Consumer behavior in on-line game communities: a motivational factor perspective Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1642-1659.
[40] Igbaria, M., Gamers, T., Davis, G.B., 1995. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114.
[41] Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., 1995. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.
[42] IP, R.K.F., Wagner, C., 2008, Weblogging: a study of social computing and its impact on organizations. Decision Support Systems, 45(2), 242-250.
[43] John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., Kentle, R.L., 1991. The Big Five Inventory--version 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
[44] John, O.P., Srivastava, S., 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Springer.
[45] Johnson, R.D., Marakas, G.M., 2000. Research report: The role of behavior modeling in computer skills acquisition -- toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 402-417.
[46] Kim, H.N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1342-1352.
[47] Korukonda, A.R., 2007. Differences that do matter: a dialectic analysis of individual characteristics and personality dimensions contributing to computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1921-1942.
[48] Koufaris, M., 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223.
[49] Kruglanski, A.W., Freund, T., 1983. The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: effects on impressional primacy, ethnic, stereotyping, and numberical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 448-468.
[50] Landers, R.N., Lounsbury, J.W., 2006. An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 283-293.
[51] Lin, C.P., Bhattacherjee, A., 2007. Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test. Information Systems Journal, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00265.x.
[52] Marcoulides, G.A., 1989. Measuring computer anxiety: the computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 733-738.
[53] Moon, J., Kim, Y., 2001. Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
[54] Nelson, D.L., 1990. Individual adjustment to information-driven technologies: a critical review. MIS Quarterly, 14(1), 79-98.
[55] Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., Yung, Y.-F., 2000. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-24.
[56] Rotter, J.B., 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 609).
[57] Shin, D.-H., 2007. User acceptance of mobile Internet: implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computers, 19(4), 472-483.
[58] Thatcher, J.B., Perrewé, P.L., 2002. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381-396.
[59] Vallerand, R.J., 1997. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advance Experiment Social Psychology, 29, 271-360.
[60] Van der Heijden, H. 2003. Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40, 541-549.
[61] Van der Heijden, H., 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
[62] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal case studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
[63] Venkatesh, V., 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
[64] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
[65] Wang, H.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., 2008. Gender differences in the perception and acceptance of online games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 787-806.
[66] Wang, K.T., Huang, Y.-M., Jeng, Y.-L., Wang, T.-I, 2008. A blog-based dynamic learning map. Computers & Education, 51(1), 262-278.
[67] Wang, Y.-S., 2003. The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 333-352.
[68] Wang, Y.-S., 2008. Assessing e-commerce systems success: A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Journal, 18(5), 529-557.
[69] Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H.-H., Tang, T.-I., 2003. Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501-519.
[70] Webster, J., Martocchio, J.J., 1992. Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 201-226.
[71] Widkipedia, 2008. Blog. Retrieved October 22, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Blog
[72] Woszczynski, A.B., Roth, P.L., Segars, A.H., 2002. Exploring the theoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 369-388.
[73] Zmud, R.W., 1979. Individual differences and MIS success: a review of the empirical literature. Management Science, 25(10), 966-979.
Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007