This study aims to investigate the acquisition process of intonation. It examines the intonation structure of Tokyo Japanese and its realization by Iranian learners of Japanese. Seven Iranian learners of Japanese, differing in fluency, and two Japanese speakers participated in the experiment. Two sentences were used to test the phonological and phonetic characteristics of lexical pitch-accent as well as the intonation patterns produced by the speakers. Both sentences consisted of similar words with the same number of syllables and lexical pitch-accents but different syntactic structure. Speakers were asked to read each sentence three times at normal speed, and the data were analyzed by Praat. The results show that lexical pitch-accent, Accentual Phrase (AP) and AP boundary tone realization vary depending on sentence type. For sentences of type XdeYwo, the lexical pitch-accent is realized properly. However, there is a rise in AP boundary tone regardless of speakers’ level of fluency. In contrast, in sentences of type XnoYwo, the lexical pitch-accent and AP boundary tone vary depending on the speakers’ fluency level. Advanced speakers are better at grouping words into phrases and produce more native-like intonation patterns, though they are not able to realize downstep properly. The non-native speakers tried to realize proper intonation patterns by making changes in lexical accent and boundary tone.
 J. B. Pierrehumbert and M. E. Beckman, Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press, 1988.
 S. Kori “Restrictive modification and realization of lexical accents in Tokyo Japanese: A quantitative study,” Journal of Language and Culture Studies., vol. 38, 2012, pp. 1-22.
 S. Kori, “Accent reduction and restrictive modification in Tokyo Japanese,” Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan., vol. 12(1), 2008, pp. 34-53.
 S. Kori, “A new analysis of accent in Tokyo Japanese: About handling rise of the beginning of the word,” Japanese Language Studies., vol. 55(2), 2004, pp. 16-31.
 N. Yamada, “Steps in the acquisition of Japanese lexical accent: The case of foreign learners,” Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, vol. 85, 1994, pp. 108-120.
 E. Takahashi, “The essential factors for acquisition of Japanese lexical accent by Korean learners: A study of advanced learners,” Journal of Japanese Language Teaching., vol. 169, 2018, pp. 16-30.
 E. Takahashi, “The acquisition of Japanese accent in English speaking learners: The relationship of knowledge and production,” Hiroshima University Japanese Language Education Research., vol. 24, 2014, pp. 1-8.
 Y. Nakato, “Pitch realization of Korean learners of Japanese in word reading,” Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, vol. 109, 2001, pp. 80-89.
 Y. Sukegawa, “Pitch realization of 2/3-mora-words by Brazilian learners of Japanese,” Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan., vol. 3(3), 1999, pp. 13-25.
 M. Ueyama, “The phonology and phonetics of second language intonation: The case of ‘Japanese English,” Fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH, Rhodes, Greece, 1997.
 T. Sato, “Comparison of the influence of monophonies and prosody on evaluation of Japanese speech,” Japanese Language Education in the World, vol.5, 1995, pp. 139-154.
 C. Nakagawa, “An attempt to teach prosody focusing on the intonation type へ,” Journal of Japanese Language Teaching., vol. 110, 2001, pp. 140-149.
 D. Ladd, Intonational Phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
 J. Venditti, “Japanese ToBI labelling guidelines,” Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 50, 1997, pp. 127-162.
 W. Poser, The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese, PhD dissertation, MIT, 1984.
 N. Sadat-Tehrani, The Intonational Grammar of Persian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manitoba, 2007.