Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10004432
Transforming Ganges to be a Living River through Waste Water Management
Abstract:
By size and volume of water, Ganges River basin is the biggest among the fourteen major river basins in India. By Hindu’s faith, it is the main ‘holy river’ in this nation. But, of late, the pollution load, both domestic and industrial sources are deteriorating the surface and groundwater as well as land resources and hence the environment of the Ganges River basin is under threat. Seeing this scenario, the Indian government began to reclaim this river by two Ganges Action Plans I and II since 1986 by spending Rs. 2,747.52 crores ($457.92 million). But the result was no improvement in the water quality of the river and groundwater and environment even after almost three decades of reclamation, and hence now the New Indian Government is taking extra care to rejuvenate this river and allotted Rs. 2,037 cores ($339.50 million) in 2014 and Rs. 20,000 crores ($3,333.33 million) in 2015. The reasons for the poor water quality and stinking environment even after three decades of reclamation of the river are either no treatment/partial treatment of the sewage. Hence, now the authors are suggesting a tertiary level treatment standard of sewages of all sources and origins of the Ganges River basin and recycling the entire treated water for nondomestic uses. At 20million litres per day (MLD) capacity of each sewage treatment plant (STP), this basin needs about 2020 plants to treat the entire sewage load. Cost of the STPs is Rs. 3,43,400 million ($5,723.33 million) and the annual maintenance cost is Rs. 15,352 million ($255.87 million). The advantages of the proposed exercise are: we can produce a volume of 1,769.52 million m3 of biogas. Since biogas is energy, can be used as a fuel, for any heating purpose, such as cooking. It can also be used in a gas engine to convert the energy in the gas into electricity and heat. It is possible to generate about 3,539.04 million kilowatt electricity per annum from the biogas generated in the process of wastewater treatment in Ganges basin. The income generation from electricity works out to Rs 10,617.12million ($176.95million). This power can be used to bridge the supply and demand gap of energy in the power hungry villages where 300million people are without electricity in India even today, and to run these STPs as well. The 664.18 million tonnes of sludge generated by the treatment plants per annum can be used in agriculture as manure with suitable amendments. By arresting the pollution load the 187.42 cubic kilometer (km3) of groundwater potential of the Ganges River basin could be protected from deterioration. Since we can recycle the sewage for non-domestic purposes, about 14.75km3 of fresh water per annum can be conserved for future use. The total value of the water saving per annum is Rs.22,11,916million ($36,865.27million) and each citizen of Ganges River basin can save Rs. 4,423.83/ ($73.73) per annum and Rs. 12.12 ($0.202) per day by recycling the treated water for nondomestic uses. Further the environment of this basin could be kept clean by arresting the foul smell as well as the 3% of greenhouse gages emission from the stinking waterways and land. These are the ways to reclaim the waterways of Ganges River basin from deterioration.

References:

[1] Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India (2011). National Ganga River Basin Authority (NGRBA). Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Volume I – Environmental and Social Analysis. Prepared by The Energy and Resources Institute Consultant.
[2] http://www.prokerala.com/maps/india/ganges-river-map.html.
[3] National Ganga River Basin Authority (2010). Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
[4] Basin boundary (IWM, 2009). www.gangapedia.in.
[5] National Water Mission under National Action Plan on Climate Change, Comprehensive Mission Document by Ministry of Water Resources 2008.
[6] The Hindu (2014). Ineffective water treatment.
[7] Madhava Kumar and Bhawna Sharma (2015). National Mission for Clean Ganga, Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation, Government of India.
[8] Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India (2013). Pollution Assessment: River Ganga, Central Pollution Control Board.
[9] Dr. C.K. Jain and M.K. Sarma (2001). Groundwater quality in adjoining areas of river Yamuna at Delhi, by National Institute of Hydrology.
[10] The Energy and Resources Institute Consultant (2011). National Ganga River Basin Authority (NGRBA), Environmental and Social Management Framework (Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India).
[11] Y. Sharma (1997). Water Pollution Control - A Guide to the Use of Water Quality Management Principles.
[12] Vishal Gandhi, Garima Dublish, Alpana Narula (2013). Pollution Assessment: River Ganga, by Central Pollution Control Board (Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India).
[13] Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources (2014). 764 Grossly Polluting Industries Indentified in Five States. Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources.
[14] R.M. Bhardwaj Senior Scientist, Central Pollution Control Board. Overview of Ganga River Pollution.
[15] Save " Ganga" Save Life (19 March 2014). Industrial Waste: Status of Grossly Polluting Industries.
[16] Arun Kumar Singh and InfoChange News & Features (2005). 30 litres for some, 1,600 for others: Inequities in Delhi's water supply.
[17] Hamner S, Tripathi A, Mishra RK, Bouskill N, Broadaway SC, Pyle BH, Ford TE (2006). "The role of water use patterns and sewage pollution in incidence of water-borne/enteric diseases along the Ganga river in Varanasi, India.” International Journal of Environmental Health Research, Montana, USA.
[18] The Bihar Times (18.10.2012). Ganga a source of cancer for Bihar, UP and West Bengal: Study.
[19] Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkey (2015). Absolving Ganga.
[20] Vishwa Mohan (May 28, 2014). Modi's focus on Ganga makes water resources ministry Important. The Times of India.
[21] Gargi Parsai in The Hindu (2014). Union Budget 2014-15: The Modi Era. Rs. 2037core for the Ganga.
[22] Press Trust of India (May 13, 2015). IST, PM Modi's 'Namami Gange Programme': Cabinet approves a massive Rs 20,000-crore budget.
[23] Anon (1999). Manual on Water Supply and Treatment, Third Edition – Revised and Updated, Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation, Ministry of Urban Development, New Delhi.
[24] Clean Ganga Mission – Way Forward (2nd July, 2015), Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation.
[25] Renee Cho (April 4, 2011). From Wastewater to Drinking Water, State of the Planet, Earth Institute, Columbia University.
[26] Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2014 and The Hindu, 11.8.2014.
[27] Kieron Monks, for CNN, 2015, From toilet to tap: Getting a taste for drinking recycled wastewater.
[28] Metcalf and Eddy (2013). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery.
[29] Dr. P.M. Natarajan, Dr. N. Vasudevan, Shambhu Kallolikar, Dr. G. Rangaraju (2015). ‘Clean Chennai is a Utopia, Without Restoration of Waterways’. Paper presented in the ASIA-PACIFIC Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Conference (2015). 28 June – 1 July 2015 Stephen Riady Centre, UTown, National University of Singapore, Singapore –1818A.
[30] Aniruddha Sharma, CEO, Carbon Clean Solutions (2015). How to Get Electricity to 300 Million People in India, Without Fossil Fuels.
[31] India: Total population from 2010 to 2020 (in millions). The Statistics Portal.
[32] Rakesh Kumar, Singh R. D. and Sharma K. D. (2005). National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, India “Water resources of India”, Current Science, Vol. 89, No. 5, 10 September 2005.
Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007