Scholarly Research Excellence

Digital Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29023


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10009134
A Survey of Online User Perspectives and Age Profile in an Undergraduate Fundamental Business Technology Course
Abstract:
Over the past few decades, more and more students choose to enroll in online classes instead of attending in-class lectures. While past studies consider students’ attitudes towards online education and how their grades differed from in-class lectures, the profile of the online student remains a blur. To shed light on this, an online survey was administered to about 1,500 students enrolled in an undergraduate Fundamental Business Technology course at a Canadian University. The survey was comprised of questions on students’ demographics, their reasons for choosing online courses, their expectations towards the course, the communication channels they use for the course with fellow students and with the instructor. This paper focused on the research question: Do the perspectives of online students concerning the online experience, in general, and in the course in particular, differ according to age profile? After several statistical analyses, it was found that age does have an impact on the reasons why students select online classes instead of in-class. For example, it was found that the perception that an online course might be easier than in-class delivery was a more important reason for younger students than for older ones. Similarly, the influence of friends is much more important for younger students, than for older students. Similar results were found when analyzing students’ expectation about the online course and their use of communication tools. Overall, the age profile of online users had an impact on reasons, expectations and means of communication in an undergraduate Fundamental Business Technology course. It is left to be seen if this holds true across other courses, graduate and undergraduate.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] T. Sitzmann, K. Kraiger, D. Stewart, and R. Wisher, “The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis”, Personnel Psychology, vol. 59, no. 3, 2006, pp. 623-664.
[2] R. M. Bernard, “Things I have learned about meta-analysis since 1990: Reducing bias in search of ‘the big picture’”, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, vol. 40, no. 3, 2014, pp. 2-17.
[3] R. M. Bernard, et al., “How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature”, Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no.3, 2004, pp. 379–439.
[4] M. Allen, J. Bourhis, N. Burrell, and E. Mabry, “Comparing Student Satisfaction with Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. American”, Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 2, 2002, pp. 83-97.
[5] M. Allen, E. Mabry, M. Mattrey, J. Bourhis, S. Titsworth, & N. Burrell, “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning: A Comparison Using Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Communication, vol.54, no.3, 2004, pp. 402-420.
[6] B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, & K. Jones, “Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies”, US Department of Education, 2009. Retrieved December 1, 2014 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505824.pdf.
[7] N. Jahng, D. Krug, & Z. Zhang, “Student achievement in online distance education compared to face-to-face education”, European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 2007. Retrieved January 18, 2018, from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Jahng_Krug_Zhang.htm.
[8] U. S. Department of Education, “Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies”, Washington, D. C., 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2013, from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based- practices/finalreport.pdf.
[9] M. Shachar, and Y. Neumann, 2003. “Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A meta-analytic approach”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 4, no. 2, 2003. Retrieved December 3, 2013, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/153/234.
[10] B. D. Medlin, S. A. Vannoy, & D.S. Dave, (2004). “An internet-based approach to the teaching of information technology: A study of student attitudes in the United States”, International Journal of Management, vol. 21, 2004, pp. 427–434.
[11] B. Dille, & M. Mezack, (1991). “Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students”, American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 1991, pp. 24–35.
[12] J. R. Howard, & A. L. Henney, “Student participation and instructor gender in the mixed-age college classroom”, The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 69, no. 4, 1998, pp. 384-405.
[13] M. S. Beqiri, N. M. Chase, N. M., & A. Bishka, (2009). “Online course delivery: An empirical investigation of factors affecting student satisfaction”, Journal of Education for Business, vol. 85, no. 2, 2009, pp. 95-100.
[14] F. Dabaj, “The role of gender and age on students' perceptions towards online education case study: Sakarya university, vocational high school”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, 2009, pp. 120-123.
[15] L. Wallace, “Changes in the demographics and motivations of distance education students”, Journal of Distance Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 1996, Spring, pp. 1–31.
[16] J. Dutton, & M. Dutton, “Characteristics and performance of students in an online section of business statistics”, Journal of Statistics Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2005, pp. 1-26.
[17] T. Soffer, T. Kahan, & E. Livne, “E-assessment of online academic courses via students' activities and perceptions”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 54, 2017, pp. 83-93.
[18] S. Cooke, “Social teaching: Student perspectives on the inclusion of social media in higher education”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017, pp. 255-269.
[19] K.J. Chromey, A. Duchsherer, J. Pruett, & K. Vareberg, “Double-edged sword: social media use in the classroom”, Journal Educational Media International, vol. 53, no.1, 2016.
[20] M. Everson, E. Gundlach, & J. Miller, “Social media and the introductory statistics course”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 5, 2013, pp. A69-A81.
[21] J. Lam, “Collaborative Learning Using Social Media Tools in a Blended Learning Course”, in S. Cheung, L. Kwok, H. Yang, J. Fong, R. Kwan (eds.) Hybrid Learning: Innovation in Educational Practices. ICHL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9167, 2015, pp 187-198, Springer, Cham.
[22] J. D. E. Thomas, D. Morin, and D. Kira, (2017). “Team-Building Skills, Social Media And Online Course Delivery”, Global Journal of Business Pedagogy, vol.1, no. 1, August, 2017, pp. 89-100.
[23] D. Morin, D. and J. D. E. Thomas, (2017). “Personality Traits, Attitudes, Motivation and Use of Social Media Tools in a Blended Course”, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, December 2017, Special Issue for INTE 2017, pp. 900-906. (Previously published in Proceedings of International Conference on New Horizons in Education Conference (INTE) INTE - ITICAM - IDEC 2017, Volume 2, July 17-19, Berlin, Germany, 897-902.)
[24] D. Morin, J. D. E. Thomas, and W. Nawfal, “Student Perspectives On A Blended Quantitative Course”. International Journal of Management and Applied Sciences (IJMAS), vol. 3, no. 7, July 2017, pp. 6-9. (Previously published in Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning (IC4E), May 11-12, Lisbon, Portugal, 2017, p. 1-4.)
[25] D. Morin, J. D. E. Thomas, & D. Kira, “Pedagogical Strategies in Online Delivery and Higher-Order Learning Skills”, NNGT Int. J. on E-learning and Education, vol. 2, October 2015. Retrieved from http://www.ijnngt.org/upload/jr4vl2/Danielle%20Morin%201.pdf
[26] S. S. Jaggars, “Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices”, American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 28, no. 1, 2014, pp. 27-38.
[27] R. Benbunan-Fich, & S.R. Hiltz, “Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses”, IEEE Transactions on Professional communication, vol. 46, no. 4, 2003, pp. 298-312.
[28] V. Barker, “Older adolescents' motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem”, Cyberpsychology &Behavior, vol. 12, no. 2, 2009, pp. 209-213.
[29] S. N. Hamade, "Perception and Use of Social Networking Sites among Undergraduate Students in Kuwait," 2013 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, 2013, pp. 439-444. doi: 10.1109/ITNG.2013.67.
Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007