Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10006824
Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Research on the Interconnection of Both Concepts and Its Impact on Non-Profit Organizations
Authors:
Abstract:
The aim of non-profit organizations (NPO) is to provide services and goods for its clientele, with profit being a minor objective. By having this definition as the basic purpose of doing business, it is obvious that the goal of an organisation is to serve several bottom lines and not only the financial one. This approach is underpinned by the non-distribution constraint which means that NPO are allowed to make profits to a certain extent, but not to distribute them. The advantage is that there are no single shareholders who might have an interest in the prosperity of the organisation: there is no pie to divide. The gained profits remain within the organisation and will be reinvested in purposeful projects. Good governance is mandatory to support the aim of NPOs. Looking for a measure of good governance the principals of corporate governance (CG) will come in mind. The purpose of CG is direction and control, and in the field of NPO, CG is enlarged to consider the relationship to all important stakeholders who have an impact on the organisation. The recognition of more relevant parties than the shareholder is the link to corporate social responsibility (CSR). It supports a broader view of the bottom line: It is no longer enough to know how profits are used but rather how they are made. Besides, CSR addresses the responsibility of organisations for their impact on society. When transferring the concept of CSR to the non-profit area it will become obvious that CSR with its distinctive features will match the aims of NPOs. As a consequence, NPOs who apply CG apply also CSR to a certain extent. The research is designed as a comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis. First, the investigation focuses on the theoretical basis of both concepts. Second, the similarities and differences are outlined and as a result the interconnection of both concepts will show up. The contribution of this research is manifold: The interconnection of both concepts when applied to NPOs has not got any attention in science yet. CSR and governance as integrated concept provides a lot of advantages for NPOs compared to for-profit organisations which are in a steady justification to show the impact they might have on the society. NPOs, however, integrate economic and social aspects as starting point. For NPOs CG is not a mere concept of compliance but rather an enhanced concept integrating a lot of aspects of CSR. There is no “either-nor” between the concepts for NPOs.
Digital Article Identifier (DAI):

References:

[1] Cadbury, A. (2000). The Corporate Governance Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8 (1), 7-15
[2] Wash, M.; Lowry, J. (2011). CSR and Corporate Governance in: Mullerat ed. The Corporate Governance of the 21st century. The Hague: Kluwer Law International
[3] OECD (2015), G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing, Paris. retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 9789264236882-en accessed on 29/12/2016
[4] Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
[5] Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–326
[6] Davis, J. H., Schoorman, D. F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). The distinctiveness of agency theory and stewardship theory. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 611–613
[7] Hernandez, M. (2008). Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 121–128. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9440-2
[8] Freeman, R. E. (2010, 1984). Strategic Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[9] Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886
[10] Freeman, R. E. (1993). Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. Retrieved from http://academic.udayton.edu/lawrenceulrich/ Stakeholder %20Theory.pdf accessed on 29/12/2016.
[11] Elms, H., Brammer, S., Harris, J. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). New directions in strategic management and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 401–425
[12] Phillips, R. A., Berman, S. L., Elms, H., & Johnson-Cramer, M. E. (2010). Strategy, stakeholders and managerial discretion. Strategic Organization, 8(2), 176–183. doi:10.1177/1476127010365721
[13] Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien (2013). Österreichischer NPO-Governance Kodex. Retrieved from: https://www.wu.ac.at/fileadmin/wu/d/cc/ npocompetence/downloads/npo-governance-kodex_ohne_erlauterungen _stand_oktober_2013.pdf accessed on 29/12/2016.
[14] Bachert, R. (Ed.). (2006). Corporate Governance in Nonprofit-Unternehmen. Planegg: WRS-Verlag
[15] Zimmer, A., & Hallmann, T. (2005). Nonprofit-Sektor, Zivilgesellschaft und Sozialkapital. In K. J. Hopt, T. von Hippel, & W. R. Walz (Eds.), Nonprofit-Organisationen in Recht, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Theorien, Analysen, Corporate Governance (pp. 103–126). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
[16] Freise, M., & Pajas, P. (2004). Organizational and legal forms of nonprofit organizations in central Europe. In A. Zimmer, E. Priller, & M. Freise (Eds.), Future of civil society. Making Central European nonprofit-organizations work (1st ed., pp. 129–146). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
[17] Hay, R. D. (1990). Strategic management in non-profit organizations: An administrator's handbook. New York: Quorum Books. 398 p
[18] Hansmann, H. (2010). The economics of nonprofit organizations. In K. J. Hopt & T. von Hippel (Eds.), Comparative corporate governance of non-profit organizations (pp. 60–72). Cambridge (U.K.);, New York, N.Y: Cambridge University Press
[19] Schröer, A. (2009). Professionalisierung und Nonprofit Leadership. In J. Eurich & A. Brink (Eds.), Leadership in sozialen Organisationen (1st ed., pp. 141–158). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/ GWV Fachverlage, Wiesbaden.
[20] Schuhen, A. (2005). Kontrollprobleme in Nonprofit-Organisationen und Lösungsansätze - Überlegungen auf Basis der Theorie und Praxis der Nonprofit Governance. In K. J. Hopt, T. von Hippel, & W. R. Walz (Eds.), Nonprofit-Organisationen in Recht, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft
[21] Sitnikov, C. (2013). CSR Life-Cycle Exploration in: Okpara, J.; Idowu, S. Corporate Social Responsibility – Callenges, Opportunities and Strategies for 21st Century Leaders. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer
[22] Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-14. DOI: 10.1002/csr
[23] Carroll A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497-505
[24] Commission of the European Communities (2001): Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/ committees/deve/20020122/com(2001)366_de.pdf accessed on 29/12/2016.
[25] Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
[26] Roselle, J. (2011) The Triple Bottom Line: Building Shareholder Value. in: Mullerat ed. The Corporate Governance of the 21st century. The Hague: Kluwer Law International
[27] Schmidpeter, R. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Management Paradigm? in: Okpara, J.; Idowu, S. Corporate Social Responsibility – Callenges, Opportunities and Strategies for 21st Century Leaders. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer
[28] Brändle, U., Noll, J. (2013). Sicherstellen von Compliance in: Zehetner, K. (2013). Financial Leadership. Wien: Linde
[29] German Corporate Governance Code (2015). Retrieved from: http://www.dcgk.de//files/dcgk/usercontent/en/download/code/2015-05-05_Corporate_Governance_Code_EN.pdf accessed on 31/12/2016
[30] Mullerat, R. (2011). The Global Responsibility of Business in: Mullerat ed. The Corporate Governance of the 21st century. The Hague: Kluwer Law International
[31] Austrian Alpine Club (UK). Retrieved from: https://aacuk.org.uk/ accessed on 29/12/2016.
[32] Leitner, J., Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Millner, R. (2008). Managerialismus in Nonprofit Organisationen: Zur Untersuchung von Wirkungen und unerwünschten Nebenwirkungen. In R. Schauer, B. P. R. Helmig, & D. Witt (Eds.), Schriftenreihe Public- & Nonprofit-Management. Steuerung und Kontrolle in Nonprofit-Organisationen. 8. Colloquium der NPO-Forscher im deutschsprachigen Raum. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, 17.-18. April 2008 (pp. 89–111). Linz: Trauner
Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007