Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10007281
Dental Students’ Attitude towards Problem-Based Learning before and after Implementing 3D Electronic Dental Models
Abstract:
Objectives: In recent years, the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Hong Kong have extended the implementation of 3D electronic models (e-models) into problem-based learning (PBL) of the Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) curriculum, aiming at mutual enhancement of PBL teaching quality and the students’ skills in using e-models. This study focuses on the effectiveness of e-models serving as a tool to enhance the students’ skills and competences in PBL. Methods: The questionnaire surveys are conducted to measure 50 fourth-year BDS students’ attitude change between beginning and end of blended PBL tutorials. The response rate of this survey is 100%. Results: The results of this study show the students’ agreement on enhancement of their learning experience after e-model implementation and their expectation to have more blended PBL courses in the future. The potential of e-models in cultivating students’ self-learning skills reduces their dependence on others, while improving their communication skills to argue about pros and cons of different treatment options. The students’ independent thinking ability and problem solving skills are promoted by e-model implementation, resulting in better decision making in treatment planning. Conclusion: It is important for future dental education curriculum planning to cope with the students’ needs, and offer support in the form of software, hardware and facilitators’ assistance for better e-model implementation.
Digital Article Identifier (DAI):

References:

[1] Joffe, L., OrthoCAD: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod, 2004. 31(4): p. 344-7.
[2] Whetten, J.L., et al., Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006. 130(4): p. 485-491.
[3] Yang, Y., L. Zhang, and S. Bridges, Blended learning in dentistry: 3-D resources for inquiry-based learning. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 2012. 4(2): p. 217-230.
[4] Omale, N., et al., Learning in 3‐D multiuser virtual environments: Exploring the use of unique 3‐D attributes for online problem‐based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2009. 40(3): p. 480-495.
[5] Barrows, H.S., Problem-based learning applied to medical education. 2000: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
[6] Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, 2004. 16(3): p. 235-266.
[7] Dolmans, D.H. and H. Schmidt, What drives the student in problem‐based learning? Medical Education, 1994. 28(5): p. 372-380.
[8] Thammasitboon, K., et al., Problem-based learning at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine: self-assessment of performance in postdoctoral training. J Dent Educ, 2007. 71(8): p. 1080-9.
[9] Al-Drees, A.A., et al., Students’ perception towards the problem based learning tutorial session in a system-based hybrid curriculum. Saudi medical journal, 2015. 36(3): p. 341.
[10] Maudsley, G. and J. Strivens, Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students. Medical education, 2000. 34(7): p. 535-544.
[11] Prosser, M. and D. Sze, Problem-based learning: student learning experiences and outcomes. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2014. 28(1-2): p. 131-142.
[12] Norman, G.R. and H.G. Schmidt, The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic medicine, 1992. 67(9): p. 557-65.
[13] Prince, M., Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 2004. 93(3): p. 223-231.
[14] Steinert, Y., et al., A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach, 2006. 28(6): p. 497-526.
[15] Lam, D.O., Impact of problem-based learning on social work students: Growth and limits. British Journal of Social Work, 2009. 39(8): p. 1499-1517.
[16] Birgegård, G. and U. Lindquist, Change in student attitudes to medical school after the introduction of problem‐based learning in spite of low ratings. Medical education, 1998. 32(1): p. 46-49.
[17] Khoiny, F.E., The effectiveness of problem-based learning in nurse practitioner education. 1995.
[18] Kriel, E.A.M., Accuracy of orthodontic digital study models. 2012, University of the Western Cape.
[19] De Boer, A., et al., Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Quality of Life Research, 2004. 13(2): p. 311-320.
[20] Nicol, D.J. and D. Macfarlane‐Dick, Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 2006. 31(2): p. 199-218.
[21] Ireland, A.J., et al., 3D surface imaging in dentistry - what we are looking at. Br Dent J, 2008. 205(7): p. 387-92.
[22] Aarnio, M., et al., Motivating medical students to learn teamwork skills. Medical Teacher, 2010. 32(4): p. e199-e204.
[23] Winning, T. and G. Townsend, Problem-based learning in dental education: what's the evidence for and against...and is it worth the effort? Aust Dent J, 2007. 52(1): p. 2-9.
[24] Azer, S.A., Problem-based learning. Challenges, barriers and outcome issues. Saudi Medical Journal, 2001. 22(5): p. 389-397.

Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007