The purpose of this paper is developing a model for audit quality, with regard to the contextual and environmental attributes of the audit profession in Iran. For this purpose, using an exploratory approach, and because of the special attributes of the auditing profession in Iran in terms of the legal environment, regulatory and supervisory mechanisms, audit firms size, and etc., we used grounded theory approach as a qualitative research method. Therefore, we got the opinions of the experts in the auditing and capital market areas through unstructured interviews. As a result, the authors revealed the determinants of audit quality, and by using these determinants, developed an Integrated Audit Quality Model, including causal conditions, intervening conditions, context, as well as action strategies related to AQ and their consequences. In this research, audit quality is studied using a systemic approach. According to this approach, the quality of inputs, processes, and outputs of auditing determines the quality of auditing, therefore, the quality of all different parts of this system is considered.
 IAASB, "Audit Quality an IAASB perspective", 2011, www.iaasb.org. (Accessed Jan 03, 2011).
 Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H., “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp: 305-360.
 Al-Ajmi, Jasim, "Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain", Advances in International Accounting, 2009, Vol. 25, pp 64–74.
 Bartov, Eli, Gul, Ferdinand A. and Tsui, Judy S.L., “Discretionary-Accruals Models and Audit Qualifications”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2000, Vol 30, No 3. pp: 421-452.
 Chambers, Payne. "Audit Quality and Accrual Reliability: Evidence from the Pre-and Post- Sarbanes-Oxley Periods." 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1136787. (Accessed May, 2008).
 Dye, R. A. “Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth”. The Journal of Political Economy. 1993, Vo. 101, No. 5, pp. 887-914.
 Lennox, C.S. “Audit quality and auditor size: An evaluation of reputation and deep pockets hypotheses”. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1999, Vol. 26, No. 78, pp. 779-805.
 Davidson, Neu. “A note on the association between audit firm size and audit quality”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1993, vol. 9, pp: 479−488.
 Karjalainen. “Audit Quality and Cost of Debt Capital for Private Firms: Evidence from Finland”, International Journal of Auditing, 2011, vol. 15, pp 88-108.
 Corbin, Juliet, Strauss, Anselm. “Basics of Qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory”. 3th edition. 2008.
 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 1985.
 Glesne, C., & Peshkin, P. “Becoming qualitative researches: An introduction”. New York, NY: Longman. 1992.
 Duff. "Measuring audit quality in an era of change: An empirical investigation of UK audit market stakeholders in 2002 and 2005", Managerial Auditing Journal, 2009, Vol. 24, pp: 400-422.
 Warming-Rasmussen, B. & and Jensen, S. “Quality dimensions in external audit services – an external user perspective”, The European Accounting Review, 1998, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 65–82.
 Hariri, N. Qualitative Research Methods: Principles and Methods. Azad University Publications. Tehran. 2006. (in Persian).