Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10006981
Digital Marketing Maturity Models: Overview and Comparison
Abstract:
The variety of available digital tools, strategies and activities might confuse and disorient even an experienced marketer. This applies in particular to B2B companies, which are usually less flexible in uptaking of digital technology than B2C companies. B2B companies are lacking a framework that corresponds to the specifics of the B2B business, and which helps to evaluate a company’s capabilities and to choose an appropriate path. A B2B digital marketing maturity model helps to fill this gap. However, modern marketing offers no widely approved digital marketing maturity model, and thus, some marketing institutions provide their own tools. The purpose of this paper is building an optimized B2B digital marketing maturity model based on a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis of existing models. The current study provides an analytical review of the existing digital marketing maturity models with open access. The results of the research are twofold. First, the provided SWOT analysis outlines the main advantages and disadvantages of existing models. Secondly, the strengths of existing digital marketing maturity models, helps to identify the main characteristics and the structure of an optimized B2B digital marketing maturity model. The research findings indicate that only one out of three analyzed models could be used as a separate tool. This study is among the first examining the use of maturity models in digital marketing. It helps businesses to choose between the existing digital marketing models, the most effective one. Moreover, it creates a base for future research on digital marketing maturity models. This study contributes to the emerging B2B digital marketing literature by providing a SWOT analysis of the existing digital marketing maturity models and suggesting a structure and main characteristics of an optimized B2B digital marketing maturity model.
Digital Article Identifier (DAI):

References:

[1] T. de Bruin, R. Freeze, U. Kaulkarni, and M. Rosemann, “Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model,” in Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), pp. 8–19, 2005.
[2] D. Chaffey, F. Ellis-Chadwick, R. Mayer, and Johnston, Internet Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education, 2009.
[3] D. Chaffey, and M. Patron, “From web analytics to digital marketing optimization: Increasing the commercial value of digital analytics,” Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp., Aug. 2012.
[4] P. Fraser, J. Moultrie, and M. Gregory, “The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability,” in IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, vol. 1, pp. 244–249, Aug. 2002.
[5] G. Holliman, and J. Rowley, “Business to business digital content marketing: marketers’ perceptions of best practice,” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 269–293, 2014.
[6] J. Järvinen, A. Tollinen, H. Karjaluoto, and C. Jayawardhena, „Digital and Social Media Marketing Usage in B2B Industrial Section,” Marketing Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 102–117, 2012.
[7] T. Mettler, “Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach,” International Journal of Society Systems Science, vol. 3, nos.1/2, pp. 81, 2011.
[8] M. H. Ofner, K. M. Huener, and B. Otto, „Dealing with complexity: A method to adapt and implement a maturity model for corporate data quality management,” in Proceedings of the fifteenth Americans Conference on Information Systems, 2009.
[9] J. Pöppelbuß, and M.Röglinger, „What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management,” in Proceedings of the conference ECIS, 2011.
[10] M. Röglinger, J. Pöppelbuß, and J. Becker, „Maturity models in business process management,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 328–346, 2012.
[11] J. Rowley, “Understanding digital content marketing,” Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 24, no. 5-6, pp. 517–540, 2008.
[12] SteinIAS, and Oracle Marketing Cloud. (2015). The Digital Marketing Maturity Index 2015.
[13] C. Wymbs, “Digital Marketing: The Time for a New “Academic Major” has Arrived,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 93–106, 2011.
[14] http://adobemarketingpro.com/#/marketing/start. “Digital marketing maturity self-assessment tool,” consulted November,12 2016.
[15] http://blogs.adobe.com/digitalmarketing/digital-marketing/whats-score-assessing-digital-marketing-maturity. “Digital marketing blog,” consulted November,12 2016
[16] http://www.smartinsights.com/members. Smart Insights, consulted November,12 2016.
[17] http://www.steinias.com, SteinIAS, consulted November, 12 2016.
Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007