Driving What’s Next: The De La Salle Lipa Social Innovation in Quality Education Initiatives
'Driving What’s Next' is a strong campaign of the new administration of De La Salle Lipa in promoting social innovation in quality education. The new leadership directs social innovation in quality education in the institutional directions and initiatives to address real-world challenges with real-world solutions. This research under study aims to qualify the commitment of the institution to extend the Lasallian quality human and Christian education to all, as expressed in the Institution’s new mission-vision statement. The Classic Grounded Theory methodology is employed in the process of generating concepts in reference to the documents, a series of meetings, focus group discussions and other related activities that account for the conceptualization and formulation of the new mission-vision along with the new education innovation framework. Notably, Driving What’s Next is the emergent theory that encapsulates the commitment of giving quality human and Christian education to all. It directs the new leadership in driving social innovation in quality education initiatives. Correspondingly, Driving What’s Next is continually resolved through four interrelated strategies also termed as the institution's four strategic directions, namely: (1) driving social innovation in quality education, (2) embracing our shared humanity and championing social inclusion and justice initiatives, (3) creating sustainable futures and (4) engaging diverse stakeholders in our shared mission. Significantly, the four strategic directions capture and integrate the 17 UN sustainable development goals, making the innovative curriculum locally and globally relevant. To conclude, the main concern of the new administration and how it is continually resolved, provide meaningful and fun learning experiences and promote a new way of learning in the light of the 21st century skills among the members of the academic community including stakeholders and extended communities at large, which are defined as: learning together and by association (collaboration), learning through engagement (communication), learning by design (creativity) and learning with social impact (critical thinking).
 Afzal, F. (2017). FAST Company’s Innovation Festival 2017: “Find your mission. Deepen your purpose”. Retrieved from http://cambridgeglobaladvisory.com/2017/11/fastco-innovation-festival-2017/.
 Amisola, Dante Jose R. “We are La Salle today: Living our Lasallian charism in every way.” Received by De La Salle Lipa Community, De La Salle Lipa, 15 May 2016, Lipa City, Batangas, Philippines, unpublished.
 Bass, R. V., & Good, J. W. (2004). Educare and educere: Is a balance possible in the educational system? The Educational Forum, 68(2), 161-168. doi:10.1080/00131720408984623.
 Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, Oregon, Arlington, Virginia and Alexandria Virginia, USA: ISTE and ASCD, 60.
 Breckenridge, J. (2011) Being person driven in a service driven organization: A grounded theory of visioning service ideals and client realities. Retrieved from http://etheses.qmu.ac.uk/ id/eprint/492.
 Encyclical 'Laudato Si': on the Care of our Common Home'. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/06/18/encyclical_laudato_si_on_the_care_of_our_common_home/1152327.
 Francis. (2015). Laudato si': On care for our common home. Retrieved from http://w2.vatican.va/content/dam/francesco/pdf/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si_en.pdf.
 Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, California, USA: Sociology Press, 57, 76.
 Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, California, USA: Sociology Press, 8.
 Glaser, B. (2014). Choosing classic grounded theory: A grounded theory reader of expert advice. Mill Valley, California, USA: Sociology Press, 390-391.
 Guiding principles of the Philippine Lasallian family. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://delasalle.ph/news/2016/5/20/guiding-principles-of-the-philippine-lasallian-family-1.
 Hooker, C. (2016). Mobile learning mindset: The teacher’s guide to implementation. Portland, Oregon and Arlington, Virginia, USA: 2016 International Society for Technology in Education, 6.
 Jerald, C. D. (2009). Defining 21st century education. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0252/e811a5dee8948eb052a1281bbc3486087503.pdf.
 Khan, S. (2012). The one world school house: Education reimagined. London: Hooder & Stoughton, 1.
 McLeod S. and Lehmann, C. (2012). What school leaders need to know about digital technologies and social media. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, Foreword.
 Price, D. (2017). Education forward: moving schools into the future. United Kingdom: Crux Publishing.
 Price, D. (2017). Postcards from the future. Retrieved from http://engagedlearning.co.uk/postcards-from-the-future/.
 Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
 Silva, E. (2008). Measuring skills for the 21st century. Education sector reports. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED503236.
 Smith, M and Baker, E. (2008). Sustainable development in the new key stage 3 curriculum. QCA. Autumn.
 Sustainable development goals. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
 The 2018 digital university: Staying relevant in the digital age. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/the-2018-digital-university-staying-relevant-in-the-digital-age.pdf.
 Wilson, K. E., Vyakarnam, S., Volkmann, C., Mariotti, S., & Rabuzzi, D. (2009). Educating the next wave of entrepreneurs: Unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st century. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1396704.
 Wong, W. (2008). Sustainable education: Community colleges as environmental champions. Community College Journal. Apr/May. Vol.78,5.