Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
17262
Effect of Different Tillage Systems on Soil Properties and Production on Wheat, Maize and Soybean Crop
Abstract:
Soil tillage systems can be able to influence soil compaction, water dynamics, soil temperature and crop yield. These processes can be expressed as changes of soil microbiological activity, soil respiration and sustainability of agriculture. Objectives of this study were: 1 - to assess the effects of tillage systems (Conventional System (CS), Minimum Tillage (MT), No-Tillage (NT)) on soil compaction, soil temperature, soil moisture and soil respiration and 2- to establish the effect of the changes on the production of wheat, maize and soybean. Five treatments were installed: CS-plough; MT-paraplow, chisel, rotary grape; NT-direct sowing. The study was conducted on an Argic-Stagnic Faeoziom. The MT and NT applications reduce or completely eliminate the soil mobilization, due to this; soil is compacted in the first year of application. The degree of compaction is directly related to soil type and its state of degradation. The state of soil compaction diminished over time, tending toward a specific type of soil density. Soil moisture was higher in NT and MT at the time of sowing and in the early stages of vegetation and differences diminished over time. Moisture determinations showed statistically significant differences. The MT and NT applications reduced the thermal amplitude in the first 15cm of soil depth and increased the soil temperature by 0.5-2.20C. Water dynamics and soil temperature showed no differences on the effect of crop yields. The determinations confirm the effect of soil tillage system on soil respiration; the daily average was lower at NT (315-1914 mmoli m-2s-1) and followed by MT (318-2395 mmoli m-2s-1) and is higher in the CS (321-2480 mmol m-2s-1). Comparing with CS, all the four conservation tillage measures decreased soil respiration, with the best effects of no-tillage. Although wheat production at MT and NT applications, had no significant differences soybean production was significantly affected from MT and NT applications. The differences in crop yields are recorded at maize and can be a direct consequence of loosening, mineralization and intensive mobilization of soil fertility.
Digital Article Identifier (DAI):

References:


[1] Al-Darby, A.M. and Lowery, B. 1987. Seed zone soil temperature and early corn growth with three conservation tillage systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, p. 768–774.
[2] Bauder, A. and Black, A.L. 1981. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and bulk density comparisons in two cropland tillage systems after 25 years and in virgin grassland. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45, p. 1166-1170.
[3] Chang, C. and Lindwall, C. W. 1989. Effects of long-term minimum tillage practices on some physical properties of a chernozemic clay loam. Can. J. Soil Sci. 69, p. 443–449.
[4] Cornish, P.S. and Lymbery, J.R. 1987. Reduced early growth of direct drilled wheat in southern New South Wales: causes and consequences. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27, p. 869–880.
[5] Edwards, J.H., C.W. Wood, D.L. Thurlow and Ruf, M.E. 1992. Tillage and crop rotation effects on fertility status of a Hapludult soil. Soc. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, p. 1577–1582.
[6] Fabrizzi, K.P., F.O. Garcia, J.L. Costa and Picone, L.I. 2005. Soil water dynamics, physical properties and corn and wheat responses to minimum and no-tillage systems in the southern Pampas of Argentina. Soil & Tillage Research 81, p. 57–69.
[7] Ferreras, L.A., J.L. Costa, F.O. Garcia and Pecorari, C. 2000. Effect of no-tillage on some soil physical properties of a structural degraded Petrocalcic Paleudoll of the southern “Pampas” of Argentina. Soil Tillage Res. 54, p. 31–39.
[8] Griffith, D.R., J.V. Mannering, H.M. Galloway, S.D. Parsons and Richey, C.B. 1973. Effect of eight tillage-planting systems on soil temperature, percent stand, plant growth, and yield of corn on five Indiana soils. Agron. J. 65, p. 321–326.
[9] Gupta, S.C., E.C. Schneider and Swan, W.B. 1988. Planting depth and tillage interactions on corn emergence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, p. 1120–1127.
[10] Gus, P., T. Rusu and Bogdan, I. 2008. Factors which impose completing preserving effects of minimum soil tillage systems on arable fields situated on slopes. 5th International Symposium - Soil Minimum Tillage System, p. 155-161, Ed. Risoprint Cluj-Napoca.
[11] Hammel, J.E. 1989. Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on bulk density and soil impedance in northern Idaho. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, p. 1515–1519.
[12] Hendrix, P.F., Chun-Ru Han and P.M. Groffman, P.M. 1988. Soil respiration in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems under different winter cover crop rotations. Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 12, Issue 2, p. 135-148.
[13] Hill, R.L. and Cruse, R. M. 1985. Tillage effects on bulk density and soil strength of two Mollisols. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, p. 1270–1273.
[14] Jitareanu, G., C. Ailincai and Bucur, D. 2006. Influence of Tillage Systems on Soil Phsical and Chemical Caracteristics and Yield in Soybean and Maize Grown in the Moldavian Plain (North – Eastern Romania). In Soil Management for Sustainability, p. 370-379.
[15] Kirkegaard, J.A., J.F. Angus, P.A. Gardner and Muller, W. 1994. Reduced growth and yield of wheat with conservation cropping. Field studies in the first year of the cropping phase. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 45, p. 511–528.
[16] Lal, R., A.A. Mahboubi and Faussey, N.R. 1994. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a Central Ohio soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, p. 517–522.
[17] Marin, D.I., M. Mihalache, C. Ciontu, C. Bolohan and Ilie, L. 2011. Influence of soil tillage of pea, wheat and maize crop in the Moara Domneasca-Ilfov area. 5th International Symposium - Soil Minimum Tillage System, p. 111-118, Ed. Risoprint Cluj-Napoca.
[18] Moraru, P.I. and Rusu, T. 2010. Soil tillage conservation and its effect on soil organic matter, water management and carbon sequestration. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, vol. 8 (3-4/2010), p. 309-312.
[19] Moraru, P.I., T. Rusu and Sopterean, M.L. 2010. Soil Tillage Conservaton and its Effect on Erosion Control, Water Management and Carbon Sequestration. In ProEnvironment/ProMediu no. 3/2010.
[20] Munawar, A., R.L. Blevins, W.W. Frye and Saul, M.R. 1990. Tillage and cover crop management for soil water conservation. Agron. J. 82, p. 773–777.
[21] Oussible, M., R.K. Crookston and Larson, W.E. 1992. Subsurface compaction reduces the root and shoot growth and grain yield of wheat. Agron. J. 84, p. 34–38.
[22] Riley, H.C.F., M.A. Bleken, S. Abrahamsen, A.K. Bergjord and Bakken, A.K. 2005. Effects of alternative tillage systems on soil quality and yield of spring cereals on silty clay loam and sandy loam soils in the cool, wet climate of central Norway. Soil and Tillage Research 80, p. 79-93.
[23] Rusu, T., P. Gus, I. Bogdan, P.I. Moraru, A.I. Pop, D. Clapa, D.I. Marin, I. Oroian and Pop, L.I. 2009. Implications of Minimum Tillage Systems on Sustainability of Agricultural Production and Soil Conservation. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, vol. 7 (2/2009), p. 335-338.
[24] Sarauskis, E., K. Romaneckas and Buragiene, S. 2009a. Impact of conventional and sustainable soil tillage and sowing technologies on physical-mechanical soil properties. Environmental Res, Engineer Management 49(3), p. 36-43.
[25] Zhai, R., R.G. Kachanoski and Voroney, R.P. 1990. Tillage effects on the spatial and temporal variation of soil water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, p. 186–192.
[26] MESP. 1987. Pedologic Studies Elaboration Metodology. Pedologic and Agrochemical Ins. Bucharest. Vol. 1-3.
[27] PoliFact. 2008. ANOVA and Duncan's test pc program for variant analyses made for completely randomized polifactorial experiences. USAMV Cluj-Napoca.
[28] SRTS. 2003. Romanian System of Soil Taxonomy. Ed. Estfalia, Bucharest, 182 pp.

Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007