Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index

Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
Evaluation of Behavior Factor for Steel Moment-Resisting Frames
According to current seismic codes the structures are calculated using the capacity design procedure based on the concept of shear at the base depending on several parameters including behavior factor which is considered to be the most important parameter. The behavior factor allows designing the structure when it is at its ultimate limit state taking into account its energy dissipation through its plastic deformation. The aim of the present study is to assess the basic parameters on which is composed the behavior factor among them the reduction factor due to ductility, and those due to redundancy and the overstrength for steel moment-resisting frames of different heights and regular configuration. Analyses are conducted on these frames using the nonlinear static method where the effect of some parameters on the behavior factor, such as the number of stories and the number of spans, are taken into account. The results show that the behavior factor is rather sensitive to the variation of the number of stories and bays.
Digital Article Identifier (DAI):


[1] Uniform building code, vol.2, Structural Engineering Design provisions. Whittier, CA, 1997.
[2] Règlement parasismique Algérien, RPA99/version 2003, CGS, 2003.
[3] Eurocode 8, Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committe for standardization, CEN, EN 1993, 2005.
[4] Ferraioli M., Lavino A. and Mandara A., Behaviour factor of code-designed steel moment-resisting frames, International journal of steel structures, vol. 14, N° 2, pp. 243-254, 2014.
[5] Elghazouli, Y., Assesment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures, Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 8, pp. 65-89, 2010.
[6] Ferraioli, M., Avossa, A. M., Progessive collapse of seismic resistant multistory frame buildings, Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE, pp. 2048-2055, 2012.
[7] ATC3-06, Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1978.
[8] ATC-19, Structural response modification factors, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, pp. 5-32, 1995.
[9] ATC-34, A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1995.
[10] ATC-63, Quantification of building seismic performance factors, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, pp. 6-31, 2008.
[11] Uang, C.-M., Bertero, V. V. Earthquake simulation tests and associated studies of a 0.3-scale model of a six-story concentrically braced steel structure. Rep. No. UCB/EERC-86/10, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1986.
[12] Whittaker, A. S., Uang, C.-M., and Bertero, V. V., Earthquake simulation tests and associated studies of a 0.3-scale model of a sixstory eccentrically braced steel structure. Rep. No. UCB/EERC-87/02, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1987.
[13] EN 1998-1, Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardisation, CEN., 2004.
[14] RPA99/version 2003, Règles parasismiques Algériennes, Document Technique Règlementaire, D.T.C., B.C. 2.48, Alger, 2003.
[15] Newmark, N. M., Hall, W. J., Earthquake spectra and design. EERI Monograph series. Oakland, 1982.
[16] Nassar, A. A., Krawincler, H., Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. Report N° 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, University, California, USA, 1991.
[17] Miranda, E, Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra, Journal of Structural Engineering, 115 (5), pp. 1319-1338, 1993.
[18] Lam, N., Wilson, J., Hutchinson, G., The ductility reduction factor in the seismic design of buildings. Earthquake Engineering and structural Dynamics, vol.27, pp. 749-769, 1998.
[19] Ordaz, M., Perez-Rocha, L. E., Estimation of strength-reduction factors for elasto-plastic systems: a new approach. Earthquake Engineering and structural Dynamics, vol.27, pp. 889-901, 1998.
[20] Newmark, N. M., Hall, W. J., Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities. Report No. 46, Building Practices for disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp. 209-236, 1973a.
[21] Newmark, N. M., Hall, W. J., Procedures and criteria for earthquake resistant design. 1973b. National Bureau of Standards, 45, pp. 94-103.
[22] Ballio, G., ECCS approach for seismic design of steel structures against earthquakes. Proc. ECCS-IABSE Symposium, Luxembourg, 1985.
[23] Giuffré, A., Giannini, R., La risposta non lineare delle strutture in cement armato. Fondamenti di Ingegneria sismica, Bologna (in Italian), 1983.
[24] Krawinkler, H., Nassar, A. A., Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities. Nonlinear seismic analysis of RC buildings, Edited by P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds. Elsevier Science, New York, pp. 23-40, 1992.
[25] Como, M., Lanni, G., Elementi di costruzioni antisismiche. Ed. Cremonese, Roma, 1979.
[26] Kato, B., Akiyama, H., Energy concentration pf multi-storey buildings, Proc. 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, 1980.
[27] Ballio, G., Castiglioni, C. A., An approach to the seismic design of steel structures based on cumulative damage criteria., Earthquake Engineering and structural Dynamics, 23, pp. 969-986, 1994.
[28] Castiglioni, C. A., Zambrano, A., Determination of the behavior factor of steel moment-resisting frames by a damage accumulation approach, Journal of constructional Saserch, 66, pp. 723-735, 2010.
[29] CEN. EN 1993-1-2. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures. Part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings. European committee for standardization Brussels; 2005.
[30] SAP2000. Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures. Advanced Version 14.0. Analysis Ref. Manual, Computer and Structures, Berkeley, CA., 2010.
Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007