Identification of Ice Hockey World Championship International Sports Event through Brand Personality
This research focused on the dimensions of brand personality of the Ice Hockey World Championship sporting event. The authors compared the elements in relation to different demographic groups including gender, age, level of education and student status of the population of Prague. Moreover, the differences of opinions of respondents who had experience of visiting a sports event and those who had not were assessed. In the research, the modified brand personality scale was used. This modified scale consists of five dimensions: responsibility, activity, toughness, individuality and emotionality, none of which was previously tested. The authors had an intentional sample of 291 respondents from Prague available, ranging in age from 18 years to 75 years, with either a high school or university education. The respondents rated the characteristic features in a seven-point Likert Scale and the data was collected in November 2012. The results suggest that the Ice Hockey World Championship is most identified with these dimensions: responsibility, emotionality and activity. Men had higher mean scores (4.93) on the Likert Scale in the emotionality dimension, while women had higher mean scores (4.91) in the activity dimension. Those respondents with experience visiting an Ice Hockey World Championship match had the highest mean score (5.10) in the emotionality dimension. This research had expected to show more pronounced mean values (above six) on the Likert scale in the emotionality and activity dimensions that more strongly characterize the brand personality of the Ice Hockey World Championship, however this expectation was not confirmed.
 K. L. Keller, “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1, 1-22, 1993.
 K. L. Keller, Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (Third edition). Boston, Pearson, 2013.
 J. T. Plumer, “How personality makes a differences” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 24, No. 6, 27-31, 1985.
 J. L. Aaker, “Dimensions of Brand Personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, 347-357, 1997.
 M. Musante, G. R. Milne, “Sport Sponsorship: Evaluating the Sport and Brand Image Match”, International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, Vol. 1, No. 1, 32-47, 1999.
 A. L. Biel, “How brand image drivers brand equity”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 32, No. 6, 6-12, 1992
 A. Azoulay, J. N. Kapferer, “Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality?”, Journal of brand management, Vol. 2, No. 2, 143-155, 2003.
 E. J. Lee, “A Prototype of Multicomponent Brand Personality Structure: A Consumption Symbolism Approach”, Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 173-186, 2013.
 M. Geuens, B. Weijters, K. De Wulf, “A new measure of brand personality”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 26, No. 2, 97-107, 2009.
 J. Petráčková, Large sporting events´ brand identification, Dissertation, Prague, 2012.
 H. S. Lee, Ch. H. Cho, “The Matching effect of brand and sporting event personality: Sponsorship implication”, Journal of Sport Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2009.
 M. Schade, R. Piehler, Ch. Burmann, “Sport club brand personality scale (SCBPS): A new brand personality scale for sport clubs”, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 21, No. 7-8, 650-663, 2014.
 E. Čáslavová, J. Petráčková, “The brand personality of large sport events”, Kinesiology, Vol. 43, No. 1, 91-106, 2011.