Scholarly Research Excellence

Digital Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29140


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10009481
Seismic Analysis of Structurally Hybrid Wind Mill Tower
Abstract:
The tall windmill towers are designed as monopole tower or lattice tower. In the present research, a 125-meter high hybrid tower which is a combination of lattice and monopole type is proposed. The response of hybrid tower is compared with conventional monopole tower. The towers were analyzed in finite element method software considering nonlinear seismic time history load. The synthetic seismic time history for different soil is derived using the SeismoARTIF software. From the present research, it is concluded that, in the hybrid tower, we are not getting resonance condition. The base shear is less in hybrid tower compared to monopole tower for different soil conditions.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] B. Gencturk, A. Attar, and C. Tort “Design Optimization of Lattice Wind Turbine Towers Subjected to Earthquake Forces” Structures Congress ASCE (2014) pp 1694 – 1703.
[2] B. Song, and J. C. Wu “Comparative Analysis on Dynamic Response of Wind Turbine Tower in Different Sites” International Efforts in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering ASCE (2014).
[3] Domenico Lombardi, Subhamoy Bhattacharya, David Muir Wood “Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 49 (2013) ELSEVIER pp 165 – 180.
[4] Elena Nuta, Constantin Christopoulos, and Jeffrey A. Packer “Methodology for seismic risk assessment for tubular steel wind turbine towers: application to Canadian seismic environment” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 38 (2011) pp 293–304.
[5] Joseph E. Bowles, “Foundation analysis and design” The McGraw-Hill Companies pp 39-45.
[6] Hani M. Negma, Karam Y. Maalawi “Structural Design Optimization Of Wind Turbine Towers” Computers and Structures Elsevier Science Ltd. 74 (2000) pp 649 – 666.
[7] Ian. Prowell, A. Elgamal, J. Lu, & J. E. Luco “Modal Properties of a Modern Wind Turbine Including SSI” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (2009) 1989-1992.
[8] Ian Prowell, P. E., Chia Ming Uang, M., Ahmed Elgamal, M. J. Enrique Luco, and Lanhui Guo “Shake Table Testing of a Utility-Scale Wind Turbine” journal of engineering mechanics ASCE July (2012) pp 900-909.
[9] M. Harte, B. Basu, S. R. K. Nielsen “Dynamic Analysis of Wind Turbines Including Soil-Structure Interaction” Engineering Structures 45 (2012) ELSEVIER pp 509 – 518.
[10] Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India website http://mnre.gov.in.
[11] Mohammad Al Hamaydeh, Saif Hussain “Optimized Frequency-Based Foundation Design for Wind Turbine Towers Utilizing Soil–structure Interaction” science direct Journal of the Franklin Institute 348 (2011) pp 1470–1487.
[12] Remi Andre Kjørlaug, Amir M. Kaynia, Ahmed Elgamal “Seismic Response of Wind Turbines due to Earthquake and Wind Loading” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN (2014).
[13] S. Jerath and S. Austin “Response of Wind Turbine Towers to Seismic Loading at Different Damping Ratios” Structures Congress 2013 © ASCE (2013) pp 1391 – 1402.
[14] Subhamoy Bhattacharya, James A. Cox, Domenico Lombardi David Muir Wood “Dynamics of offshore wind turbines supported on two foundations” ice proceedings (2012) Geotechnical Engineering Volume 166.

Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007