Because die drawing requires insertion of a die, a plug, or a mandrel, higher precision and efficiency are demanded for drawing equipment for a tube having smaller diameter. Manufacturing of such tubes is also accompanied by problems such as cracking and fracture. We specifically examine dieless drawing, which is less affected by these drawing-related difficulties. This deformation process is governed by a similar principle to that of reduction in diameter when pulling a heated glass tube. We conducted dieless drawing of SUS304 stainless steel microtubes under various conditions with three factor parameters of heating temperature, area reduction, and drawing speed. We used SEM-EBSD to observe the processing condition effects on microstructural elements. As the result of this study, crystallographic orientation of microtube is clear by using SEM-EBSD analysis.
 T. Furushima, K. Manabe and T. Sakai, “Fabrication of Superplastic Microtubes Using Dieless Drawing Process (Periodical style)”, Journal of the JSTP, Vol. 47, No. 548, 2006, pp. 870-874.
 T. Furushima and K. Manabe, “Fabrication of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Fine Tubes by Dieless Drawing Process (Periodical style)”, Journal of the JSTP, Vol. 51, No. 597, 2010, pp. 990-992.
 S. Biswas, S. Suwas, R. Sikand and A. K. Gupta, “Analysis of texture evolution in pure magnesium and the magnesium alloy AM30 during rod and tube extrusion (Periodical style)”, Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. A-528, 2011, pp. 3722-3729.
 M. Kamaya, “Measurement of Plastic Strain Distribution by Electron Backscatter Diffraction (Periodical style)”, Journal of the Society of Materials Science Japan, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2009, pp. 568-574.
 H. Kimura, Y. Wang, Y. Akiniwa and K. Tanaka, “Misorientation Analysis of Plastic Deformation of Austenitic Stainless Steel by EBSD and X-Ray Diffraction Methods (Periodical style)”, Transactions of the JSME, Vol. 71, No. 712, 2005, pp. 1722-1728.