Scholarly Research Excellence

Digital Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29140

Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
Soil Quality State and Trends in New Zealand’s Largest City after 15 Years
Soil quality monitoring is a science-based soil management tool that assesses soil ecosystem health. A soil monitoring program in Auckland, New Zealand’s largest city extends from 1995 to the present. The objective of this study was to firstly determine changes in soil parameters (basic soil properties and heavy metals) that were assessed from rural land in 1995-2000 and repeated in 2008-2012. The second objective was to determine differences in soil parameters across various land uses including native bush, rural (horticulture, pasture and plantation forestry) and urban land uses using soil data collected in more recent years (2009- 2013). Across rural land, mean concentrations of Olsen P had significantly increased in the second sampling period and was identified as the indicator of most concern, followed by soil macroporosity, particularly for horticultural and pastoral land. Mean concentrations of Cd were also greatest for pastoral and horticultural land and a positive correlation existed between these two parameters, which highlights the importance of analysing basic soil parameters in conjunction with heavy metals. In contrast, mean concentrations of As, Cr, Pb, Ni and Zn were greatest for urban sites. Native bush sites had the lowest concentrations of heavy metals and were used to calculate a ‘pollution index’ (PI). The mean PI was classified as high (PI > 3) for Cd and Ni and moderate for Pb, Zn, Cr, Cu, As and Hg, indicating high levels of heavy metal pollution across both rural and urban soils. From a land use perspective, the mean ‘integrated pollution index’ was highest for urban sites at 2.9 followed by pasture, horticulture and plantation forests at 2.7, 2.6 and 0.9, respectively. It is recommended that soil sampling continues over time because a longer spanning record will allow further identification of where soil problems exist and where resources need to be targeted in the future. Findings from this study will also inform policy and science direction in regional councils.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):


[1] Arshad, M. A. & Martin, S. 2002. Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 88, 153-160.
[2] Cotching, W. E. & Kidd, D. B. 2010. Soil quality evaluation and the interaction with land use and soil order in Tasmania, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 137, 358-366.
[3] Schloter, M., Dilly, O. & Munch, J. C. 2003. Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98, 255-262.
[4] Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Corell, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley,A. N. & Smith, V. H. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 8, 559- 568.
[5] Curran-Cournane, F., Vaughan, M., Memon, A. & Fredrickson, C. 2014b.Trade-offs between high class land and development: recent and future pressures on Auckland’s valuable soil resources. Land Use Policy 39, 146-154.
[6] Ajmone-Marsan, F. &Biasioli, M. 2010. Trace elements in soils of urban areas. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 213, 121-143.
[7] UNESA 2013. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available:
[8] ARC 2010. State of the Auckland Region. Auckland Regional Council ISBN 978-1-877540-45-5 pg 301.
[9] Hill, R. B. & Sparling, G. P. 2009. Soil quality monitoring. Chapter 3 in Land and Soil Monitoring: A guide for SoE and Regional Council Reporting; New Zealand
[10] Kim, N. D. & Taylor, M. D. 2009. Trace element monitoring. Chapter 5 in Land and Soil Monitoring: A guide for SoE and Regional Council Reporting; New Zealand In: Land Monitoring Forum, N. Z. (ed.).
[11] Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean, L. A. (eds.) 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate: United States Department of Agriculture Circular No. 939. Washington, D.C. USA
[12] Blakemore, L. C., Searle, P. L. & Daly, B. K. 1987. Methods for chemical analysis of soils. NZ Soil Bureau Scientific Report 80, Lower Hutt, DSIR Soil Bureau.
[13] Keeney, D. R. &Bremner, J. M. 1966. Comparison and evaluation of laboratory methods of obtaining an index of soil nitrogen availability. Agronomy Journal, 58, 498-503.
[14] Silva , Y. J. a. B., Nascimento, C. W. A. &Biondi, C. M. 2014. Comparison of USEPA digestion methods to heavy metals in soil samples. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 47-53.
[15] Genstat 2014. Genstat for Windows. Seventeenth Edition. VSN International Ltd, Oxford.
[16] Sigmaplot 2014. Version 12.0 for Windows. 'Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60611.
[17] Biasiolia, M., Barberisb, R. & F, A.-M. 2006. The influence of a large city on some soil properties and metals content. Science of the Total Environment, 356, 154-164.
[18] Chen, T. B., Zheng, Y. M., Lei, M., Huang, Z. C., Wu, H. T., Chen, H., Fan, K. K., Yu, K., Wu, X. &Tian, Q. Z. 2005. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere, 60, 542-551.
[19] Curran-Cournane, F., Fraser, S., Hicks, D. L., Houlbrooke, D. J. & Cox, N. 2013. Changes in soil quality and land use in grazed pasture within rural Auckland. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 56, 102- 116.
[20] Hewitt, A. E. (ed.) 1998. New Zealand Soil Classification: Manaaki Whenua Press: Lincoln, New Zealand.
[21] Singleton, P. L. & Addison, B. 1999. Effects of cattle treading on physical properties of three soils used for dairy farming in the Waikato, North Island, New Zealand. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 891- 902.
[22] Curran Cournane, F., McDowell, R. W., Littlejohn, R. P. & Condron, L. M. 2011. Effects of cattle, sheep and deer grazing on soil physical quality and phosphorus and suspended sediment losses in surface runoff. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 140, 264-272.
[23] McDowell, R., Sharpley, A., Brookes, P. &Poulton, P. 2001. Relationship between soil test phosphorous and phosphorus release to solution. Soil Science, 166, 137–149.
[24] Garcia, R., Maiz, I. &Millan, E. 1996. Heavy metal contamination analysis of road soils and grasses from Gipuzkoa (Spain). Environmental Technology, 17, 763-770.
[25] Pouyat, R. V., Yesilonis, I. D., Szlavecz, K., Csuzdi, C., Hornung, E., Korso´S, Z., Russell-Anelli, J. & Giorgio, V. 2008. Response of forest soil properties to urbanization gradients in three metropolitan areas. Landscape Ecology, 23, 1187-1203.
[26] Rodrigues, S., Pereira, M. E., Duarte, A. C., Ajmone-Marsan, F., Davidson, C. M., Grčman, H., Hossack, I., Hursthouse, A. S., Ljung, K., Martini, C., Otabbong, E., Reinoso, R., Ruiz-Cortés, E., Urquhart, G. J. &Vrščaj, B. 2006. Mercury in urban soils: A comparison of local spatial variability in six European cities. Science of the Total Environment 368, 926-936.
[27] Trammell, T. L. E., Schneid, B. P. &Carreiro, M. M. 2011. Forest soils adjacent to urban interstates: soil physical and chemical properties, heavy metals, disturbance legacies, and relationships with woody vegetation. Urban Ecosystems, 14, 525-552.
[28] Ward, N., Brooks, E. R., Robert, E. & Boswell, C. R. 1977. Heavy-metal pollution from automotive emissions and its effect on roadside soils and pasture species in New Zealand. Environmental Science & Technology, 11, 917-920.
[29] Yesilonis, I. D., Pouyat, R. V. &Neerchal, N. K. 2008. Spatial distribution of metals in soils in Baltimore, Maryland: Role of native parent material, proximity to major roads, housing age and screening guidelines. Environmental Pollution 156, 723-731.
[30] Falahi-Ardakani, A. 1984. Contamination of environment with heavy metals emitted from automotives. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 8, 152-161.
[31] Councell, T. B., Duckenfield, K. U., Landa, E. R. & Callender, E. 2004. Tire-wear particles as a source of zinc to the environment. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 4206-4214.
[32] Harrison, R., M, Johnston, W., R, Ralph, J., C & Wilson, S., J 1985. The budget of lead, copper and cadmium for a major highway. Science of the Total Environment, 46, 137-145.
[33] Canty, M. J., Scanlon, A., Collins, D. M., McGrath, G., Clegg, T. A., Lane, E., Sheridan, M. K. & More, S. J. 2014. Cadmium and other heavy metal concentrations in bovine kidneys in the Republic of Ireland. Science of the Total Environment, 485-486, 223-231.
[34] Roberts, A. H. C., Longhurst, R. D. & Brown, M. W. 1994. Cadmium status of soils, plants and grazing animals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 37, 119-129.
[35] Taylor, M. 1997. Accumulation of cadmium derived from fertilisers in New Zealand soils. Science of the Total Environment, 208, 123-126.
[36] Curran-Cournane, F., Khin, J. & Hussain, E. 2014. Soil quality for horticultural sites in the Auckland region and changes after 18 years. Auckland Council Technical Report TR2014/023 ncil/planspoliciespublications/technicalpublications/tr2014023soilqualit yforhorticulturalsitesinauckland2013.pdf.
[37] Haynes, R. &Tregurtha, R. 1999. Effects of increasing periods under intensive arable vegetable production on biological, chemical and physical indices of soil quality. Biological Fertility of Soils, 28, 259- 266.
[38] Gaw, S., Wilkins, A., Kim, N., Palmer, G. & Robinson, P. 2006. Trace element and DDT concentrations in horticultural soils from the Tasman, Waikato and Auckland regions of New Zealand. Science of the Total Environment, 355, 31-47.
[39] Cavanagh, J. E. 2013. Determining background soil concentrations of contaminants for managing land. Prepared for Marlborough District Council by Landcare Research May 2013. Envirolink Advice Grant 1251-MLDC83.
[40] NZWWA 2003. Guidelines for the safe application of biosolids to land in New Zealand. New Zealand Water and Wastes Association, Wellington, New Zealand.
[41] Curran-Cournane, F., Lear, G., Schwendenmann, L. & Khin, J. 2015. Heavy metal soil pollution is influenced by the location of green spaces within urban settings. Soil Research (accepted DOI: 10.1071/SR14324).
[42] Reganold, J. P. & Palmer, A. S. 1995. Significance of gravimetric versus volumetric measurements of soil quality under biodynamic, conventional, and continuous grass management Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50, 298-305.
[43] Edbrooke, S. W. 2006. Geology of the Auckland area. Institute of Geological Nuclear Sciences Limited 2006. (Vector Data) 1:250000 Geological Map.

Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007