Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10004312
The Effect of Diversity Sensitive Orientation on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention
Abstract:
The main purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of diversity sensitive orientation on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Diversity sensitive orientation is the attitude of the individual to respect and accommodate diversity. This is focused on an individual’s perception of diversity. Although being made from the most diversity related research team and organizational level, this study deals with diversity issues at the individual level. To test the proposed research model and hypothesis, the data were collected from 291 Korean employees. The study conducted a confirmatory factor analysis for the validity test. Furthermore, structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to test the hypothesized relationship in the conceptual model. The results of this paper were as followings: First, diversity sensitive orientation was positively related to job satisfaction. Second, diversity sensitive orientation was negatively related to turnover intention. In other words, the positive influence of the diversity sensitive orientation has been verified. Based on the findings, this study suggested implications and directions for future research.
Digital Article Identifier (DAI):

References:

[1] K. A. Jehn, G. Northcraft, and M. Neale, “Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, Vol. 44(4), pp. 741-763.
[2] G. S. Van der vert, E. Vliert, and X. Huang, “Location-level links between diversity and innovative climate depend on national power distance”, Academy of Management Journal, 2005, Vol. 48(6), pp. 1171-1182.
[3] D. A. Harrison, and K. Klein, “What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations”, Academy of management Review, Vol. 32(4), pp.1199-1228.
[4] M. Shemla, B. Meyer, L. Greer, and K. A. Jehn, “A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team`s composition affect team processes and outcomes?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Published online in Wiley Online Library, 2014.
[5] S. H. Sung, “Diversity in korean firms: An exploratory study on diversity management strategy, HR practices, diversity sensitive orientation, and firm performance”, Graduate School of Business Administration, Yonsei University, Doctoral Dissertation, 2005.
[6] J. E. Lee, “The Influence of Diversity Sensitive Orientation and Managing Diversity upon Outcome of Human Resource Management”, Graduate School of Global Human Resource Development, Chung-Ang University, Master′s Thesis, 2012.
[7] K. H. Dansky, R. Weech-Maldonado, G. De Souza, and J. L. Dreachslin, “Organizational strategy and diversity management: Diversity sensitive orientation as a moderating influence”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 28(3), pp. 243-253.
[8] E. A. Locke, “What is job satisfaction?”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 4(4), pp. 309-336.
[9] M. S. Heo, and M. J. Cheon, “An empirical study on the relationship of antecedents of flow, organizational commitment, knowledge sharing and job satisfaction”, The Journal of information systems, 2008, Vol. 16(4), pp. 1-31.
[10] J. P. Meyer, N. J. Allen, and I. R. Gellatly, “Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations”, Journal of applied psychology, 1990, Vol. 75(6), pp. 710-720.
[11] D. G. Allen, L. M. Shore, and R. W. Griffeth, “The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process”, Journal of Management, 2003, Vol. 29(1), pp. 99-118.
[12] M. Billig, H. Tajfel, “Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1973, Vol. 3(1), pp. 27-52.
[13] M. C. Schippers, D. N. Den Hartog, P. L. Koopman, and J. A. Wienk, “Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effects of reflexivity”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2003, Vol. 24, pp. 779-802.
[14] A. Cummings, J. Zhou, and G. Oldham, “Demographic differences and employee work outcomes: Effects of multiple comparison groups”, Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA, 1993.
[15] A. C. Homan, L. L. Greer, K. A. Jehn, and L. Koning, “Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition”, Group Process & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 13(4), pp. 477-493.
[16] J. S. Leonard, D. I. Levine, and A. Joshi, “Do birds of a feather shop together? The effects on performance of employees' similarity with one another and with customers”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, Vol. 25(6), pp. 731-754.
[17] P. B. Warr, and T. Routledge, “An opinion scale for study of managers’ job satisfaction”, Occupational Psychology, 1969, Vol. 43(3), pp. 95-109.
[18] C. A. O’Reilly Ш, J. Chatman, and D. F. Caldwell, “People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit”, Academy of Management Journal, 1991, Vol. 34(3), pp. 487-516
[19] B. R. BAE, “Structural Equation Modeling with Amos 21 –Principles and Practice-”, Chungram Publishing, 2014.
[20] H. Tajfel, and J.C. Turner, “The social identity theory of intergroup behavior”, In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
[21] K. A. Jehn, C. Chadwick, and S. M. Thatcher, “To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 8(4), pp. 287-305.

Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007