Scholarly Research Excellence

Digital Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29050


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10009622
The Emerging Global Judicial Ethics: Issues and Problems
Abstract:
In many states around the world, actions to improve judicial ethics are developing significantly through the production of professional standards for judges. The quest to improve the ethics of judges is legitimate. However, as this development tends to be very important at the moment, some risks it presents must be highlighted. Indeed, if the objective of improving Judges’ Ethics is legitimate, it can also lead to banalization of justice, reinforcement of criticism against the judiciary and to broach incidentally the question of the limits of judgment, which is most perilous for the independence of the judiciary. This research, based on case studies, interviews with judges and an analysis of the literature on this topic (mainly from the United States of America and European Union Member States), tends to draw attention to the fact that the result of the development of these professional standards is that the ethical requirements of judges become ethical requirements of justice, which is an undesirable effect of which we must be aware, in order to prevent it.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] Liptak, A., « Ruth Bader Ginsburg, No Fan of Donald Trump, Critiques Latest Term », New York Times, July 10, 2016. See https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-no-fan-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html.
[2] Le Monde, 29 avril 2014. See http://lemonde.fr/societe/article/2014/04/29/pour-le-csm-un-magistrat-ne-doit-pas-tweeter-en-plein-proces
[3] Coulon, J.-M., Soulez-Larivière, D. (2002), La Crise de la justice, Ed. O. Jacob.
[4] Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S., Widdop, S., Fitzgerald, R., Yordanova, M. & Galev, T. (2011). « Developing European indicators of trust in justice ». European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), pp. 267-285.
[5] Huppé, L. (2004). « Les fondements de la déontologie judiciaire ». Les Cahiers de droit, vol. 45, n° 1, p. 122.
[6] Kozinski, A. (2004), « The Real Issues of Judicial Ethics », Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 32: Iss. 4, Article 1.
[7] Davis, M. H., « A Government of Judges: An Historical Review ». The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 35, No. 3 (Summer, 1987), pp. 559-580.
[8] William L. Landes W. & Richard A. Posner, « The Independent Judiciary in an Interest Group Perspective », Journal of Law & Economics, 18, 1975, 875.
[9] « Judicial independence does not guarantee that judicial decisions will serve the public interest » according to R. A. Epstein, « The Independence of Judges: The Uses and Limitations of Public Choice Theory », Brigham Young University Law Review, 1990, 828.
[10] Foulquier, C. (2011), « L’indépendance de la Justice : une notion indépendante ? », Actes de la journée d’études L’indépendance de la justice, 19 novembre 2010, Presses universitaires de Sceaux.
[11] Judge Irving R. Kaufman, « Lions or jackals: the function of a code of Judicial Ethics », 35 Law and Contemporary Problems 3-8 (Winter 1970), 6.
[12] Cynthia Gray, Advisory « Committees Let Judges Look Befor They Leap », 42 Judges’ Journal 29 (2003), 29.
[13] Mamoudy, O. « Les avis et recommandations du collège de déontologie de la juridiction administrative », RFDA 2015, 368.
[14] Morissette, Y.-M., « Comment concilier déontologie et indépendance judiciaires ? », Mc Gill Law Journal, June 1, 2003, 297.
[15] CCJE (2002) Op. N° 3.
[16] Benyekhlef, K., Lavarone-Turcotte, C., Vermeys, N., « Comparative Analysis of Key Characteristics of Court Administration Systems », Canadian Judicial Council, 2011.
[17] Alt E., Le Theule, M.-A., « La justice aux prises avec l’éthique et la performance », Pyramides, 22/2011, p. 137-159.
[18] Ronald Sackville, « Judicial Ethics and Judicial Misbehaviour: two sides of the one coin? », The Journal of Law and Social Justice, Vol. 3 (2009), 8.
[19] Public financing of judicial elections was envisaged to overcome this difficulty. See Miner, R. J. (2004), « Judicial Ethics in the Twenty-First Century: Tracing the Trends », Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 32: Iss. 4, Article 2, 1110.
[20] Li Yuwen, « L’éthique professionnelle des juges chinois: un nouvel enjeu dans le paysage des pratiques judiciaires », Perspectives chinoises, n°76, 2003.
[21] Le Monde, 27 juillet 2016, http://lemonde.fr/europe/article/2016/07/27/hongrie-le-juge-qui-a-dit-non-a-viktor-orban_4975348_3214.html.
[22] Ferejohn, J. « Independent judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence », Southern California Law Review, Vol. 72.353, 1999, 369.
[23] American Judiciature Society, « What is Judicial Independence? », http://www.ajs.org/cji/cji_whatisji.asp
[24] Swisher, K. (2007) « The unethical Judicial Ethics of Instrumentalism and Detachment in American Legal Thought », Willamette Law Review, 588-593.
[25] http://www.conseil-superieur-magistrature.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/recueil_des_obligations_deontologiques_des_magistrats_fr.pdf, visited on April 25, 2017.
Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007