Excellence in Research and Innovation for Humanity

International Science Index


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10007389
Transformative Leadership and Learning Management Systems Implementation: Leadership Practices in Instructional Design for Online Learning
Authors:
Abstract:
With the growth of online learning, several higher education institutions have attempted to incorporate technology in their curriculum. Successful technology implementation projects really on technology infrastructure and on the acceptance of education professionals towards innovation. This research study is aimed at illustrating the relevance of the human component in technology implementation projects in higher education by describing the Learning Management System implementation project executed by instructional designers working for a higher education institution in the southeast region of the United States. An analysis of the Transformative Leadership Theory, the Technology Acceptance Model, and the Diffusion of Innovation Process provide the support for a solid understanding of this issue and address recommendations for future technology implementation projects in higher education institutions.
Digital Article Identifier (DAI):

References:

[1] Wilson, B. M., Pollock, P. H., & Hamann, K. (2014). Spillover effects in online discussions: Assessing the effectiveness of student preceptors. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(1), 15-24. doi:10.1080/19331681.2013.848178
[2] Smith, P., Rao, L., & Thompson, S. (2013, May). Towards developing a cost-benefit model for learning management systems. Presented at the International Conference on Information Resources Management, Natal, Brazil. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=confirm2013W.-K. Chen, Linear Networks and Systems (Book style). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993, pp. 123–135.
[3] Lister, M. (2014). Trends in the design of e-learning and online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 671-680. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no4/Lister_1214.pdf
[4] Kentnor, H. E. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1), 22-34. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2643748B
[5] Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective online instruction in higher education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11-14.
[6] Emelyanova, N., & Voronina, E. (2014). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 272-289. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1701
[7] Wang, P. A. (2015). Assessment of asynchronous online discussions for a constructive online learning community. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(8), 598-604. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.575
[8] Hall, R. A. (2015). Critical thinking in online discussion boards: Transforming an anomaly. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(3), 21-43. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3673685051/critical-thinking-in-online-discussion-boards-transforming
[9] Bonvillian, W. B., & Singer, S. R. (2013). The online challenge to higher education. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(4), 23-30. Retrieved from http://issues.org/29-4/the-online-challenge-to-higher-education/
[10] Annan, D. L. (2008). Facilitating adoption of technology in higher education. Distance Learning, 5(1), 13-17.
[11] Coskuncay, D. F., Ozkan, S. (2013). A model for instructors’ adoption of learning management systems: Empirical validation in higher education context. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 13-25. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v12i2/1222.pdf
[12] Wichadee, S. (2015). Factors related to faculty members’ attitude and adoption of a learning management system. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 53-61. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i4/1445.pdf
[13] AbuShawar, B. A., & Al-Sadi, J. A. (2010). Learning management systems: Are they knowledge management tools? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 5(1), 4-10. Retrieved from http://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/887
[14] Liebowitz, J. (2013). A comparative study of emerging technologies for online courses. Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-11.
[15] Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., Avgerinou, M. D., & Moore, J. (2009). The effect of learning management systems on student and faculty outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 82-83. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751609000657
[16] Asiri, M. J., Mahmud, R., Bakar, K. A., & Ayub, A. F. bin M. (2012). Factors influence the use of learning management system in Saudi Arabian higher education: A theoretical framework. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 125-137. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p125
[17] Alias, N. A., & Zainuddin, A. M. (2005). Innovation for better teaching and learning: Adopting the learning management system. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 27-40. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.119.9362&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[18] Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
[19] Johnson, T., Wisniewski, M. A., Kuhlemeyer, G., Isaacs, G., & Krzykoski, J. (2012). Technology adoption in higher eduction: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63-72.
[20] Ribble, M., & Miller, T. N. (2013). Educational leadership in an online world: Connecting students to technology responsibly, safely, and ethically. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 135-143.
[21] Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the technology acceptance model (TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 210-232. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Fathema_0615.pdf
[22] Motshegwe, M. M., & Batane, T. (2015). Factors influencing instructors’ attitudes toward technology integration. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 8(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://tnet1.theti.org/evaluate/infoSingleArticle.do?articleId=1334449&columnId=1334443
[23] Kezar, A. J., Carducci, R., Contreras-McGavin, M. (2011). Changes in the Landscape of higher education leadership research. Rethinking the “L” word in higher education: The revolution of research on leadership. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(6), 101-136.
[24] Bass, B. M., Riggio, R. E. (2010). The transformation model of leadership. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.), Leading Organizations: Perspectives for a New Era (2nd ed.) (pp. 76-86). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[25] Brigance, S. K. (2011). Leadership in online learning in higher education: Why instructional designer for online learning should lead the way. Performance Improvement, 50(10), 43-48. doi: 10.1002/pfi.20262
[26] Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base. New York, NY: Routledge.
[27] Ryan, T. G., Toye, M. T., Charron, K., & Park, G. (2012). Learning management system migration: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 220-237. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1126/2120
Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007