Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29527


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10002174
Life Cycle Assessment as a Decision Making for Window Performance Comparison in Green Building Design
Abstract:
Life cycle assessment is a technique to assess the environmental aspects and potential impacts associated with a product, process, or service, by compiling an inventory of relevant energy and material inputs and environmental releases; evaluating the potential environmental impacts associated with identified inputs and releases; and interpreting the results to help you make a more informed decision. In this paper, the life cycle assessment of aluminum and beech wood as two commonly used materials in Egypt for window frames are heading, highlighting their benefits and weaknesses. Window frames of the two materials have been assessed on the basis of their production, energy consumption and environmental impacts. It has been found that the climate change of the windows made of aluminum and beech wood window, for a reference window (1.2m×1.2m), are 81.7 mPt and -52.5 mPt impacts respectively. Among the most important results are: fossil fuel consumption, potential contributions to the green building effect and quantities of solid waste tend to be minor for wood products compared to aluminum products; incineration of wood products can cause higher impacts of acidification and eutrophication than aluminum, whereas thermal energy can be recovered.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] James Salazar, Life cycle assessment case study of North American residential windows, MASTER thesis, the University of British Columbia December 2007.
[2] Recio, J.M.B, Narvaez, R.P., and P. J. Guerrero. 2005. Estimate of energy consumption and CO2 emission associated with the production, use and final disposal of PVC, aluminium, and wooden windows. Department de Projectes d'Engineyeria, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Environmental Modelling Laboratory Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved on August 23, 2007 from http://www.aboutpvc.org/recursos/12recurso.pdf.
[3] Asif M., A. Davidson, and T. Muneer. "Life cycle of window materials- A comparative assessment." Millennium Fellow School of Engineering, Napier University, Edinburgh http://www. cibse. org/pdfs/Masif. Pdf, 2002.
[4] The World Steel Association, “Life cycle inventory study for steel products”, report, 2011.
[5] Mary A. Curran, “Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products”, Wiley, 2012.
[6] Richter K, Kiinniger T, Brunner K. Environmental assessment of window constructions of different frame materials (without glazing) (in German). Empa-SZFF-Forschungsbericht, Schweizerische Zentralstelle fiir Fenster- und Fassadenbau (SZFF), Dietikon, 1996.
[7] Kreissig J, Baitz M, Betz M, Straub W. Ganzheitliche Bilanzierung von Fenstem und Fassaden. Institut for Kunststoffpriifung der Universitat Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 1997.
[8] Werner F., et al, Wooden Building Products in Comparative LCA a Literature Review, Wood and Other Renewable Resource. Int J LCA 12 (7) 47Q-479, 2007.
[9] Jungmeier G. et al, Allocation in LCA of Wood-based Products Experiences of Cost Action E9, Part II. Examples, LCA Case Studies, Int J LCA 7 (6) 369 – 375, 2002.
[10] Elizabeth Minne et al, “Influence of climate on the environmental and economic life cycle assessments of window options in the United States”, Buildings, Volume 102, Pages 293–306, 2015.
[11] ISO 14040, “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework”, 1st Edition, 1997.
[12] Alumina Technology Roadmap (minor update), International Aluminium Institute, March 2006. (www.worldaluminium.org/UserFiles/File/AluminaTechnologyRoadma p%20Update%20FINAL%20M y%20 2006.pdf)
[13] Weir, G. and Muneer, T., Energy and Environmental Impact Analysis of Double-Glazed Windows, Energy Convers. Mgmt Vol. 39, No.3/4, pp. 243-256, 1998.
[14] Bjorn Berge, The Ecology of Building Materials, Architectural Press, 2001.
[15] Industrial Technologies Program, “U.S. Energy Requirements for Aluminum Production”, Tech. Report, 2007.
[16] Jungmeier G. et al, Allocation in LCA of Wood-based Products Experiences of Cost Action E9, Part I. Methodology, LCA case study, Int J LCA 7 (5) 290 - 294, 2002.
[17] Edwards, D. and Schelling, J., Municipal Waste Life Cycle Assessment Part1, And Aluminium Case Study, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Aug 1996.
[18] Udo de Haes, H. A., Jolliet, O., Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M., Krewitt, W. & Mueller-Wenk, R. Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: Part 1. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 4, 66_74, 1999.
[19] The Athena Sustainable Materials Institute Ottawa, ON, Canada and Kutztown PA, USA [email protected] www.athenasmi.org.
[20] Bruce Lippke and President Corri, Wood products life cycle analysis: New research shows the environmental benefits from using wood.
[21] Pennington, D. W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G, Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, 0., Rydberg, T. and G. Rebitzer. Life Cycle Assessment Part 2: Current Impact Assessment Practice. Env. Int. 30(5): 721-739, 2004.
[22] Mark Goedkoop, SimaPro 5, Toutorial the wood example. November 2002.
Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007