Third Places for Social Sustainability: A Planning Framework Based on Local and International Comparisons
Social sustainability, as an independent perspective of sustainable development, has gained some acknowledgement, becoming an important aspect in sustainable urban planning internationally. However, limited research aiming at promoting social sustainability within urban areas exists within the South African context. This is mainly due to the different perspectives of sustainable development (e.g., Environmental, Economic, and Social) not being equally prioritized by policy makers and supported by implementation strategies, guidelines, and planning frameworks. The enhancement of social sustainability within urban areas relies on urban dweller satisfaction and the quality of urban life. Inclusive cities with high-quality public spaces are proposed within this research through implementing the third place theory. Third places are introduced as any place other than our homes (first place) and work (second place) and have become an integrated part of sustainable urban planning. As Third Places consist of every place 'in between', the approach has taken on a large role of the everyday life of city residents, and the importance of planning for such places can only be measured through identifying and highlighting the social sustainability benefits thereof. The aim of this research paper is to introduce third place planning within the urban area to ultimately enhance social sustainability. Selected background planning approaches influencing the planning of third places will briefly be touched on, as the focus will be placed on the social sustainability benefits provided through third place planning within an urban setting. The study will commence by defining and introducing the concept of third places within urban areas as well as a discussion on social sustainability, acting as one of the three perspectives of sustainable development. This will gain the researcher an improved understanding on social sustainability in order for the study to flow into an integrated discussion of the benefits Third places provide in terms of social sustainability and the impact it has on improved quality of life within urban areas. Finally, a visual case study comparison of local and international examples of third places identified will be illustrated. These international case studies will contribute towards the conclusion of this study where a local gap analysis will be formulated, based on local third place evidence and international best practices in order to formulate a strategic planning framework on improving social sustainability through third place planning within the local South African context.
 Al-Hagla, K. 2008. Towards a Sustainable Neighbourhood: The Role of Open Spaces. Archnet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 2(2), pp 162- 177.
 Alidoust, S., Bosman, C. & Holden, G. 2015. Socially Healthy Ageing: The Importance of Third Places, Soft Edges and Walkable Neighbourhoods. State of Australian Cities Conference 2015.
 Assefa, G., & Frostell, B., 2007, Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies: Technology in Society, v. 29, iss. 1, p. 63-78.
 Atiqul, H.A.Q. & Shah, M.D. 2011. Urban green spaces and an integrated approach to sustainable environment. Journal of Environmental Protection, (2):601-608.
 Baltimore City Department of Planning. 2010. Downtown Open Space Plan, Baltimore, Maryland. Project for Public Spaces, Flannigan Consulting, Sabra Wang Associates, 202 pp.
 Biart, M. (2002) ‘Social sustainability as part of the social agenda of the European community’, in Ritt, T. (Ed.): Soziale Nachhaltigkeit: Von der Umweltpolitik zur Nachhaltigkeit? Arbeiterkammer Wien, Informationen zur Umweltpolitik 149, Wien, pp.5–10.
 Camp, B.H. 2015. A Study of Third Place: Benefits of Shared Leisure Practices in Public Gathering Places. Murfreesboro: TN. (Dissertation – PhD)
 Cilliers, E. J. 2010. Rethinking Sustainable development: The Economic Value of Green Spaces. Potchefstroom: NWU. (Dissertation – M).
 Cilliers, E. J. & Cilliers, S. 2016. Planning for Green Infrastructure: Options for South African Cities. South African Cities Network: pp. 4-37.
 Commissioner for Children and Young People. 2011. Caring for the future growing up today: Building spaces and places for children and young people. http://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBwQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2F
www.ccyp.wa.gov.au%2Ffiles%2FBuilding%2520spaces%2520and%2520places%2520for%2520children%2520and%2520young%2520people.pdf&ei=2wwgVKDlA8XR7Qa2-4GIDA&usg=AFQjCNEgUTKo1DHIJT4zmEFLq_tbFiDyAw&bvm=bv.75775273,d.ZWU. Date of access: 17 Aug. 2017.
 Crick, A. (2011). New third places: Opportunities and challenges. Advances in Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5, 63-77.
 Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S. & Brown, C. 2011. The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5):289-300.
 Dewar, D. & Uytenbogaardt, S. R. 1995. Creating vibrant urban places to live: a primer. Cape Town: Headstart Developments. Date of access: 12 Jun. 2017.
 Hardoy J., Mitlin D. & Satthertwaite D., (1992), Environmental Problems in Third World Cities, Earthscan Publications, London.
 Harris, M. 2003. Sustainability and Sustainable Development. International Society for Ecological Economics, Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics. http://isecoeco.org/pdf/susdev.pdf. Date of access: 14 Aug. 2017.
 McAllister, C. 2008. Child friendly cities and land use planning: Implications for children’s health. Environments Journal, 35(3):45-56. https://www.google.co.za/?gws_rd=ssl#q=McAllister%2C+C.++2008.++Child+friendly+cities+and+land+use+planning%3A+. Date of access: 2 Nov. 2017.
 Mehta, V. & Basson, J.k. 2010. Third Places and the Social Life of Streets. Sage Publications, 42(6) 779–805. https://www.raggeduniversity.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Thrid-Places-and-social-life-of-streets-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf. Date of access: 6 Nov. 2017.
 Mensah, C.A. 2014. Urban Green Spaces in Africa: Nature and Challenges. International Journal of Ecosystem, 4(1). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Collins_Adjei_Mensah/publication/
259779329_Urban_Green_Spaces_in_Africa_Nature_and_Challenges/links/02e7e52dd1ca9c4078000000.pdf. Date of access: 11 Jun. 2017.
 Metropolitan Planning Council. 2008. Place making Chicago: A neighbourhood guide to place-making in Chicago. Four key qualities of a successful place. http://www.placemakingchicago.com/about/qualities.asp. Date of access: 8 Nov. 2017.
 Oldenburg, R. 1999. The Great Good Place: cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons and other hangouts at the heart of a community, Da Capo Press.
 Palacky, J. Wittmann, M. Frantisak, L. 2015. Evaluation of Urban Open Spaces Sustainability. https://dspace.vutbr.cz/bitstream/handle/11012/42779/PALACKYAESOP2015FULLPAPERFINAL.pdf?sequence=13. Date of access: 10 Sep. 2017.
 Power, A. 2004. Sustainable communities and sustainable development: a review of sustainable communities. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28313/1/CASEreport23.pdf. Date of Access 21 Oct. 2017.
 Sachs, I. 1999. Social sustainability and whole development: exploring the dimensions of sustainable development. In: B. Egon and J. Thomas, Editors, Sustainability and the social sciences: a cross disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation, Zed Books, London.
 Schilling, J. 2010. Towards a Greener Green Space Planning. http://www.lumes.lu.se/database/alumni/08.10/Thesis/Schilling_Jasper_Thesis_2010.pdf. Date of access: 10 Apr. 2017.
 Town and Country Planning Association: The Wildlife Trust. 2012. Planning for a healthy environment – good practice guidance for green infrastructure and biodiversity. https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/sites/default/files/Green-Infrastructure-Guide-TCPA-TheWildlifeTrusts.pdf. Date of access: 12 May. 2017.